[rmcat] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06: (with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 09:29 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED58E1329C8; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, csp@csperkins.org, rmcat@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.61.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150538139894.12621.17177152345859451451.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 02:29:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/hYSVsFNVGmiSndvslR1UGltzSFY>
Subject: [rmcat] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:29:59 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Editorial: age 1: The first sentence: “When multiple congestion controlled RTP sessions...”. I suggest expanding the “RTP”, like Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), since it first appear in the document. Page 1: The last sentence: “It specifies how to apply the method for the NADA congestion control...”. I suggest expanding the “NADA”, like Network-Assisted Dynamic Adaptation (NADA). The reason same to above item. Page 3: The first paragraph: “sometimes the rate is increased further, until packets are ECN-marked or dropped.” I suggest adding a reference to help the readers understanding “ECN-marked”. Page 3: Suggest adding a term definition: “Flow State Identifiers (FSIs)” which be used in section 4 but not be introduced in the section 2 Definitions. Page 11: 6.1 NADA -- " Network-Assisted Dynamic Adapation (NADA) [I-D.ietf-rmcat-nada] is a congestion control scheme for rtcweb." I suggest adding a reference or some sentence to help the readers understand the “rtcweb”. A run of idnits revealed there were 0 error, 3 warning and 2 comments: Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- The document date (March 28, 2017) is 140 days in the past. Is this intentional? -- Found something which looks like a code comment -- if you have code sections in the document, please surround them with '<CODE BEGINS>' and '<CODE ENDS>' lines. Checking references for intended status: Experimental ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == Outdated reference: A later version (-04) exists of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-03 == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-04 == Outdated reference: A later version (-08) exists of draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-04 Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 3 warnings (==), 2 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above.
- [rmcat] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-iet… Benoit Claise