Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada

Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8FE131B80; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q7acDaD_ttfD; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 455ED131B92; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-86fff70000005f66-d8-59710aa51e77
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.87]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0A.32.24422.5AA01795; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:55:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.145) by oa.msg.ericsson.com (153.88.183.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.352.0; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:55:16 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ericsson-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=u/E7Veu2jvbwKPWEHGUtIp2bGQA8fpsT1/rlYZzxwos=; b=DnTB/uqq0Uh+MgHpJRXZbdZ9TfWryyGxevx5cnlK1iR3b24KKA7spek4RwTzwT1V7yrJ+gEIZ46ML6kbGjf+Y6z46ZvlMT/DkrHOHesAdMPf72rzxVWzhRBUbZDyPFO6XfN+oM/MPJefU6TyWehlgaVzhXC1EAHLwjqPCoZppEw=
Received: from DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.234.148) by DB4PR07MB347.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.234.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1282.4; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:55:15 +0000
Received: from DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8189:db45:e10d:bbc0]) by DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8189:db45:e10d:bbc0%16]) with mapi id 15.01.1282.011; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:55:15 +0000
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>, "Flohr, Julius" <julius.flohr@uni-due.de>, "Sergio Mena de la Cruz (semena)" <semena@cisco.com>
CC: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>, "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rmcat-nada@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rmcat-nada@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
Thread-Index: AQHS8dNhy65fQ5vDK0m2BUYcYMBYhKJDji0ggBXWXwCAAN95AIAAkgMAgABIEQCAAf71gIAAG9Pw
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:55:15 +0000
Message-ID: <DB4PR07MB348D79F58A6246C1F6757D4C2A70@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <7c5453a5-65f6-6f74-6214-346469c8abce@kau.se> <c8d9ec64-c332-fa8d-dd20-3dd307aabb97@kau.se> <DB4PR07MB348F7D8702DC16028081554C2D70@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <62513FF8-0A36-45FC-878C-7D03A1772A2A@uni-due.de> <6ca96a44-0ca2-2704-41f6-3eaeaf35afa7@kau.se> <aa200a17-1d8c-9570-2b51-364a08a131a6@cisco.com>, <830396B0-DCDB-42F3-BAF7-EE122CA123D1@uni-due.de> <1500572924701.63015@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1500572924701.63015@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.81]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR07MB347; 7: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
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fd3be568-0d2c-479d-fa28-08d4cfa93dab
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254075)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:DB4PR07MB347;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB4PR07MB347:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(35073007944872)(95692535739014)(148717330147763);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR07MB347B3A57328C1F3A3E1A405C2A70@DB4PR07MB347.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(6072148)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:DB4PR07MB347; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:DB4PR07MB347;
x-forefront-prvs: 0374433C81
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39860400002)(39840400002)(39850400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39400400002)(13464003)(377454003)(252514010)(24454002)(53936002)(50986999)(76176999)(54356999)(9686003)(5250100002)(99286003)(7696004)(2950100002)(5660300001)(6436002)(55016002)(54906002)(3280700002)(93886004)(3660700001)(2906002)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(229853002)(6506006)(478600001)(230783001)(25786009)(74316002)(14454004)(33656002)(189998001)(2900100001)(305945005)(86362001)(38730400002)(6246003)(7736002)(8676002)(81166006)(8936002)(66066001)(53546010)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR07MB347; H:DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jul 2017 19:55:15.5311 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR07MB347
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02Sa0hTYRjHe885OzuOBqel+GAZtgrJW5YR+yBlVDoCu3zI1LBaetDlfcdM JdKFWXirxLxleclLUys0M2VeR4nTRE0IzVTmJcsFKWhTV9a2Y9C33/P8n/9zeXkpXPSMZ0fJ o+IYRZQsQkwKiEL/N+ddKwWxAe7ZWjtJz8owLhksn+VJqr8kSWpHF0hJXf5PvkSfWoV5kdJc Yz1PWlGxikl/D94mpcqUFuwMESjwDGEi5PGMYt/hy4KwuvlZMqbLKeHd0CM8Bb0QpyMrCuiD 0Dr2ip+OBJSIfotA97qS4IIeBMY76zxzQNBZOJS23EWckofB+7lcjAt0CB43dePmZiTtCSqN wVJlTecjUA4bLX6czkHQttTBN1dtpX2gdHWKNLM1LYU/ml6M40B40DdvclOmgXtgee24OS00 pXvU+o2lKnHIWesnzIIV7QJpi2kWRrQ9TBomLIzTtvBppgTjzqOhonUA59gGvk1zByE6C4FK ZSQ5wQG6C1QEx/bwoSTDcgLQkySsp6VsuH1hyVDF5wQdBuruXD4n7IWMieYNdzh8LZtDHMtB 80NJcoZOHjSq2zc6bYeRujaME7Q8WOob491HzkX/7c6xG4w8zCU5doaqMj1eZHmQLaAtnCFK EVGDbFiGZSNDD3i4MQp5MMtGR7lFMXENyPR/uhqNrs2oVn9Ug2gKiTcLextiAkQ8WTybGKlB QOFia2HfsiklDJElJjGK6EuKaxEMq0HbKEJsK/RqH/QX0aGyOCacYWIYxT8Vo6zsUtB1dCTs nu7GrqbTxcket85mHnrS74FdTVfpg3YUCgdujnuv+KhCdMrJAj+HBKnqVMeUYWeiT2FwdlD5 rH+jUuLum3rhSpajOm8wwzG59/nnlyc6z21Z3DQ9u7sms0vX6Xfx5EK53vg01uu7c9pSme2x kV/a2lHv4I9DBcnj1VMu9cVigg2T7XfCFazsL2mdkLs7AwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/j8GwDVqX844JpxGFVkz8vGZFejI>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 19:55:22 -0000

Hi Xiaoqing + others

To your ECN question... This is tricky, if I understand things right you tie NADA to a specific ECN marking algorithm. For instance CoDel will display a completely different ECN marking behavior. The snag is that with classic ECN marking like this you can only indicate the existence of congestion. It is AFAIK possible to accurately indicate the degree of congestion. 
L4S is a different story as it allows to indicate the degree of congestion.

/Ingemar 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu) [mailto:xiaoqzhu@cisco.com]
> Sent: den 20 juli 2017 19:48
> To: Flohr, Julius <julius.flohr@uni-due.de>de>; Sergio Mena de la Cruz (semena)
> <semena@cisco.com>
> Cc: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>se>; Ingemar Johansson S
> <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>om>; rmcat@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rmcat-
> nada@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
> 
> Catching up on this thread.
> 
> Thanks much to Julius, Ingmar, and Safiqul for reviewing this draft and
> providing your input.
> 
> Regarding Ingmar's comments:
> 
> * Page 8, computation of d_tilde and the risk of being locked in the loss-
> based mode due to non-linear warping:  fully agree that this is a limitation of
> the algorithm we should acknowledge in the draft.  In the meanwhile would
> like to work with Julius to look into specific example failure cases, and
> hopefully derive further insights on how to better tune the algorithm
> parameters.  Will update both our ns3-rmcat implementation and NADA draft
> after that investigation.
> 
> * Section 5.1.2 : Estimation of p_mark : as I understand your comments point
> to the fact that different ECN marking behaviors may occur and some (e.g.,
> L4S) may not interact well with NADA.  It is true that we have not tested
> NADA extensively against different variants of ECN markings --- the one's
> we've tried before are RED (marking instead of dropping).  One way to help
> clarify that will be to point to our Appendix A.2 as the specific ECN marking
> behavior we expect, in Sec. 5.1.2.  Do you think that will address your
> concern?
> 
> And, thanks to Julius for sharing with us issues you've observed in your
> implementation efforts.  We've set up a separate email thread to meet up
> remotely and go over that in greater technical details.
> 
> Question back to the Chairs:  our plan now is to update both our draft (to
> address both sets of Ingmar's comments) and corresponding ns3 open-
> source implementation, within a month.  Procedure-wise, are we expecting
> the updated version (-05) to go through WGLC again at that point?  Just trying
> to understand what to expect next.
> 
> Thanks,
> Xiaoqing
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Flohr, Julius <julius.flohr@uni-due.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 6:19 AM
> To: Sergio Mena de la Cruz (semena)
> Cc: Anna Brunstrom; Ingemar Johansson S; rmcat@ietf.org; draft-ietf-rmcat-
> nada@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rmcat] Still looking for reviews of draft-ietf-rmcat-nada
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > On 19. Jul 2017, at 09:01, Sergio Mena <semena@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > As for Julius's tests, we thank Julius for the effort put into it, and would like
> to see how his results compare to our latest ones (see Slides presented by
> Xiaoqing in April's RMCAT interim).
> >
> 
> I haven't done too much testing, but as far as I can tell there is an issue when
> the bottleneck bandwidth is smaller than RMAX:
> If you have a competition scenario between NADA and a loss based flow, it
> seems that nada gets stuck in the competitive mode because itself creates
> queueing delay that is larger than QTH.
> 
> I actually made a little mistake when I said the problem has gotten worse
> compared to the last version of the draft. The issue actually has been
> introduced in version 03 with the introduction of TEXPLOSS. Before, the draft
> was very unclear and stated that one should warp the congestion signal IFF
> packet loss is present, but without stating a time span.
> 
> Therefore the implementation just used the knowledge it had from the
> recent observation window LOGWIN (500 ms). That worked really well
> because it helped the algorithm to return to the normal mode of operation
> more easily, because after that timespan it would stop warping regardless
> whether there is lots of queueing delay present or not.
> 
> I don't know if this is an issue with my implementation or if there is an actual
> issue with the algorithm, but this is what I have observed.
> 
> I'll contact Xiaoqing and Sergio directly so we can work together on this issue
> and post our findings to this mailing list directly.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Julius
> 
> 
> =====================================
> Julius Flohr, M.Sc.
> University of Duisburg-Essen
> Computer Networking Technology Group
> 
> Room SL-408
> Schützenbahn 70
> D-45326 Essen/Germany
> 
> E-Mail:  julius.flohr@uni-due.de
> Phone: +49-201-183-7667
> Fax:     +49-201-183-7673
> =====================================