[rmcat] No rmcat session at IETF 98

Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se> Fri, 10 February 2017 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=02144650be=anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C4C129A6B for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGr2MLFmK0kH for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tiger.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DC0129A5B for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:38:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Processed: mail.kau.se, Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:38:26 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDRemoteIP: 95.192.10.244
X-MDArrival-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:38:26 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: anna.brunstrom@kau.se
X-Return-Path: anna.brunstrom@kau.se
X-Envelope-From: anna.brunstrom@kau.se
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rmcat@ietf.org
To: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>
References: <b467db4e-3452-4d18-5f25-73dafab6b2fb@gmail.com>
From: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
Message-ID: <ec00aa2c-d68e-5a79-4615-297da66b5fc5@kau.se>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:38:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b467db4e-3452-4d18-5f25-73dafab6b2fb@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/kcqMkg4w_5DzYKXln9-MnBcHNe8>
Subject: [rmcat] No rmcat session at IETF 98
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:38:36 -0000

Dear all,

As we only have one probable and three confirmed attendees for an rmcat 
session in Chicago, we will not hold a meeting this time.

We will come back shortly for instead scheduling a virtual interim a few 
weeks after IETF 98.

Best Regards,
Anna


On 2017-02-01 11:09, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The WG chairs would like to get a poll about who out of the rmcat WG 
> intends to travel to the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago.
>
> Please let us know until Feb 5th midnight by replying to this email.
>
> We would plan for an interim meeting shortly after the IETF 98 meeting 
> in case that there is not a critical mass intending to attend a RMCAT 
> session.
>
> Regards,
>
>   Martin
>