[rmcat] RFC 8868 on Evaluating Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time Media

rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Wed, 20 January 2021 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA843A10FC; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:23:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HecGk0NHXtzp; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:23:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99F43A1107; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:22:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 57D81F4079A; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:22:42 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rmcat@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210120002242.57D81F4079A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:22:42 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/kfkMIgenh7HuxNbBeODfIjtS0xk>
Subject: [rmcat] RFC 8868 on Evaluating Congestion Control for Interactive Real-Time Media
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:23:48 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8868

        Title:      Evaluating Congestion Control for Interactive 
                    Real-Time Media 
        Author:     V. Singh,
                    J. Ott,
                    S. Holmer
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2021
        Mailbox:    varun.singh@iki.fi,
                    ott@in.tum.de,
                    holmer@google.com
        Pages:      13
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-14.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8868

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8868

The Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) is used to transmit media in
telephony and video conferencing applications. This document
describes the guidelines to evaluate new congestion control
algorithms for interactive point-to-point real-time media.

This document is a product of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC