[rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq
Dave Täht <dave@taht.net> Fri, 26 August 2016 06:14 UTC
Return-Path: <dave@taht.net>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2F612D196; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BbnsiYdpQLXp; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0515712D127; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dair-2506.local (c-73-71-234-12.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.234.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB8262131E; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:14:54 +0000 (UTC)
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, rmcat@ietf.org, bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
From: Dave Täht <dave@taht.net>
Message-ID: <fff498ff-a205-eadb-7c17-3a9420d1b439@taht.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:14:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/kigxke6OnnUjwNAZWUhgNCWpn-Y>
Subject: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:14:59 -0000
Pretty good paper at: http://c3lab.poliba.it/images/0/0e/Gcc_aqm.pdf I do keep hoping the videoconferencing folk give ecn a shot one day, especially for iframes. Has anyone pursued the early line of work for ecn that was in nada, or tried to add it to gcc? Another hope is that we see more videoconferencing analyses on wifi and at higher baseline rates than 2mbit.
- [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq Dave Täht
- Re: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq Ingemar Johansson S