[rmcat] Background traffic traces
Simone Ferlin <simone@ferlin.io> Tue, 12 December 2017 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <simone@ferlin.io>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB02D129410; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:07:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=ferlin.io
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vo-Hx_h06u00; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n1nlsmtp02.shr.prod.ams1.secureserver.net (n1nlsmtp02.prod.ams1.secureserver.net [188.121.43.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984AB12940F; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n1plcpnl0047.prod.ams1.secureserver.net ([46.252.205.173]) by : HOSTING RELAY : with SMTP id OhSWeusudjzE4OhSWeyqoU; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:06:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ferlin.io; s=default; h=Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version: Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=B2hYbMlPqVeRQjXapCYh5WI99d+U1QD47BERhxLJrM4=; b=T0/C1MjaIQL4oYxJv9LgjOhvZZ EU0me1O8gmeTnrhW2JXcAcWF9DsqoBQYLNgnpIpMLjd9vfTvEfR5vRG2/nLE0KB8yeR/ZTDeQZV7c xJWXOv8Q9RN5qNtAWtcHhGsK4n0hpJsnY9XUYy2EBa+fmF8BWs/a95iPvupBhvOmH5zhUimboLmK1 LMXK6v+IAY5PjuDNFa5fBEV6pg5HnMoE9Ib4i/0wcfKvX6YozrlUEE56ZS4H9vETpk+OzndMR2jpJ WB/Kl2JSkxYtPERVRCRGbTpUH2RTyDDXHF03uVIlZiLWjzqmsTVtezdT/M+aujp4Ej6lxP7vrC/TU DOWTS7+Q==;
Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:43338) by n1plcpnl0047.prod.ams1.secureserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <simone@ferlin.io>) id 1eOhSW-0004fR-Gs; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:06:44 -0700
Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b18so13083550pgv.10; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:06:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mK9lrZrxwIpLOC9NBbHdK8IMhsRMcDsT2tfszGE7Ay1MG5gbjYR UUUpAN7Bd1wl1854l7muHbiS1K3zmf6rNpFbdtU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovrc2khvtD32J8OYzDz5MfbJxCtoQqe40icySNq+QxqvNe+txFLuR2tJAMXM1Uic6UmmArLthzO3f98ufo/HIw=
X-Received: by 10.84.130.33 with SMTP id 30mr1757436plc.161.1513073203589; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:06:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.151.15 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:06:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Simone Ferlin <simone@ferlin.io>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:06:23 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACOM=LKO-OWxzw7rH2Jn3QeQrqHkbytt+tQQ6O33ZiDLN_Tyeg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACOM=LKO-OWxzw7rH2Jn3QeQrqHkbytt+tQQ6O33ZiDLN_Tyeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: rmcat@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - n1plcpnl0047.prod.ams1.secureserver.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ferlin.io
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: n1plcpnl0047.prod.ams1.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: simone@ferlin.io
X-Authenticated-Sender: n1plcpnl0047.prod.ams1.secureserver.net: simone@ferlin.io
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfHgFBEBss8GS9ZeZOrVQVYdAhohsqBSRXuZbXjWNxfjsyi0w/Rk9VOWuMNQafkCfNPE1OwPTsO+ste8//jnKdu3BZxWDYHGIrO9oaNPvotrH2N/jD1fR PcgqF/RghF085cNiv2P8TTLuRWxkOEMN5vAv1wreDQrmC0Ae+SfguSSGlLMTY0WJeiM98OMJdQ9VGZDzkEH9zdZtqzBp02W//jllQf0GWlFytlglWnk8vO4m
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/q4zPoR67Zmv-NymfcvLjFNtWbzA>
Subject: [rmcat] Background traffic traces
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:07:53 -0000
Hello all, Sorry for the spam for those in both lists... Is there any remote chance that anybody in this group is working with some common traffic traces from a real capture to compare algorithms? I remember seeing this in RMCAT few months (if not years...) ago, but my search now ended in /dev/null. Any pointers to find something like that? I am trying to replace some components such as synthetic traffic traces for a (controlled) measurement setup, and this would be of great help. Thanks, Simone
- [rmcat] Background traffic traces Simone Ferlin
- Re: [rmcat] Background traffic traces Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [rmcat] Background traffic traces Sergio Mena