Re: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-12.txt

[Colin Perkins <[e-mail]>]

This version makes the following changes, in response to IESG and 
directorate review comments:

* Adds a paragraph to the Introduction summarising the key conclusion

* Updates reference to RFC 793bis to point to RFC 9293

* Adds discussion of IPv6, with tables 3, 4, and 7 showing the overhead 
for using IPv6 as a comparison to IPv4

* Fixes the calculations in Table 6 to match the text.

* Adds a comment in the Discussion and Conclusions noting that improved 
video compression exacerbates the feedback overhead, while the trend 
towards higher quality video over time has the reverse effect

Colin




On 22 Dec 2022, at 9:36, [e-mail] wrote:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance 
> Techniques WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Sending RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Feedback 
> for Congestion Control in Interactive Multimedia Conferences
>         Author          : Colin Perkins
>   Filename        : draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-12.txt
>   Pages           : 20
>   Date            : 2022-12-22
>
> Abstract:
>    This memo discusses the rate at which congestion control feedback 
> can
>    be sent using the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) and its suitability 
> for
>    implementing congestion control for unicast multimedia 
> applications.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-12
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-rtp-cc-feedback-12
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at 
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts