Re: [rmcat] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-12: (with COMMENT)

Joerg Ott <jo@netlab.tkk.fi> Thu, 19 March 2020 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jo@netlab.tkk.fi>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70A53A09EF; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 547d2MhGiloR; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out-01.aalto.fi (smtp-out-01.aalto.fi [130.233.228.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1494C3A097E; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out-01.aalto.fi (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 4D097115856_E73A6BAB; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:07:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.177]) by smtp-out-01.aalto.fi (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTP id 20F76115825_E73A6BAF; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:07:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183131E13A; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:07:06 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at luuri.netlab.hut.fi
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rFnfI4NhREF7; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:07:00 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ip5f5bede2.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.91.237.226]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15FF81E138; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:07:00 +0200 (EET)
From: Joerg Ott <jo@netlab.tkk.fi>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, varun.singh@iki.fi, draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria@ietf.org, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, rmcat@ietf.org, csp@csperkins.org
References: <158338697599.29425.2368220403595942513@ietfa.amsl.com> <4380266f-4b71-0725-e45b-15b73aa4d522@netlab.tkk.fi>
Message-ID: <60067c03-198b-7916-2a99-b1221a2e4b0f@netlab.tkk.fi>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:06:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4380266f-4b71-0725-e45b-15b73aa4d522@netlab.tkk.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SASI-RCODE: 200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/tOtCC2uI7SJyA04ojNCp4RYdn5w>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:07:25 -0000

AFAIK we now addressed all comments we got.

Best,
Jörg

On 19.03.20 18:05, Joerg Ott wrote:
> Thanks, Adam, Alexey, and Barry.
> 
> Fixed in -14.  I am just sending one reply to this comment.
> 
> Best,
> Jörg
> 
> On 05.03.20 06:42, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote:
>> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-12: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I agree with the comments about Section 3.1 by Alexey and Adam.
>>
>> With respect to Éric’s comment about Section 2, the verb is the last 
>> word,
>> “apply”.  Only, the subject in “terminology”, which takes a singular 
>> verb, so
>> it should be “applies”.
>>
>>