IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq

Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Sat, 27 August 2016 10:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F15212D532; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QFT2BaiEWfx; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6E712D1E4; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-917ff700000019a3-b7-57c164ef88e3
Received: from ESESSHC018.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.72]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id CB.F1.06563.FE461C75; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:01:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.145) by oa.msg.ericsson.com (153.88.183.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:01:18 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ericsson-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=R/1Ym+Helv4TaJOl+Ugpd8jwQOiii/H+e1cViyqgzQE=; b=e7vHGghX4ajKWbr63yaBy/HLCK6ysUMVhbpYel5Pw7EwkhByqgOpUJ5bkUp5MtO+o3otNTUDwfak09xPpdiQ6ADw64lF2KAVNUxtX1pSraHlJWle6gqgGhsisjyBOAsCSPzNGjv+5STC0jArEAVxqMtpFDv/oM05V5T3k/jgUkU=
Received: from DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.234.148) by DB4PR07MB346.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.234.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.549.15; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:01:16 +0000
Received: from DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.234.148]) by DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.234.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0587.013; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:01:16 +0000
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: Dave Täht <dave@taht.net>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>, "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq
Thread-Index: AQHR/8xZnN4PVvKNfEuurKbUaV76m6BckWlQ
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:01:16 +0000
Message-ID: <DB4PR07MB34843FB4CDBD276BBE71921C2EF0@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <fff498ff-a205-eadb-7c17-3a9420d1b439@taht.net>
In-Reply-To: <fff498ff-a205-eadb-7c17-3a9420d1b439@taht.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [213.113.27.92]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d7c25353-1915-4bae-0337-08d3ce611607
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR07MB346; 6:Nyrnul626UlHastxg+prGc67aD0/a7EfuwVu5il9+FBPvJurv95C883SKbJfvFVSnZeoLF9kaladGemYkRgFlMg1qzFyR2TLqHM1cHVibUH+D6c/SLEO8yYgzJ9QRjISX83T09vi4nEOjhLSKCJS2v2xCINqIsYzj1UxQNHP/qiCTS05PBzz675kSS39TXZ4Y+tPdxUB7LEKDgXynslRyQnUTJ23WKIcJnPW++S831cf30HfhEJ1Qp5LEnRHmtZC8qRU1jVQR8/D2/8o/4dtqmHCabr0Sv9dzrXqsZ4e4kM=; 5:ZCZR6IFSr6G4nP3HwrutRG2Wy8BKT4wXwbHSHzilwmrWLWnm5KguDzQpfxABZp8ANcwmTwefUGTVj+DMhDdiOe8NO4aUv5opm90IaeQqRZGBa1psi56PmSUiHrKPZ5CPdEPRhqHWER6Q9YnY18Mi4g==; 24:p2qBWo96I/cgxwsjco/fCarN3+F0Rz6e0VJOLsDgcj0rr9+E/XL13X4/EfMXYpXuyVKw9w8+fbVLyVssyn8yd1jvkzkpWlReDUiOZ8xBJ28=; 7:DrpJaBEeeYf6rN2XmyUgmhy5rIeII0+htPxvnpqLcMCQV9L2283clbDCCPDL35QMOikTq7BbB1sn5HS9XwSCfW26DcExHjpzM4iwYgzZQxNK0EHuKeK2IjY1UhBnJEI39aSh0IZHle7F4Aidhtp3dZsjETHP6Cf1u/hvjJ/Nz7O2RP1LcWtvITjltEEx3VAlci2bh12aURVj08fRaxmDbB2L5rhB79EddiOMluCscXP1Lt6YxFBf2d2qd0MwYY28
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR07MB346;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR07MB3467015C7D69CF0D67F4598C2EF0@DB4PR07MB346.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:DB4PR07MB346; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR07MB346;
x-forefront-prvs: 0047BC5ADE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(13464003)(586003)(10400500002)(105586002)(2501003)(8676002)(11100500001)(19580395003)(3280700002)(19580405001)(5002640100001)(33656002)(92566002)(76576001)(7846002)(2950100001)(87936001)(2900100001)(106116001)(107886002)(5001770100001)(19625735002)(189998001)(97736004)(50986999)(9686002)(2906002)(8936002)(76176999)(74316002)(122556002)(7696003)(15975445007)(81166006)(7736002)(66066001)(86362001)(81156014)(2201001)(101416001)(54356999)(102836003)(6116002)(5660300001)(3846002)(77096005)(106356001)(68736007)(3660700001)(305945005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR07MB346; H:DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Aug 2016 10:01:16.4338 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR07MB346
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02Sa0hTYRjHeXcuHkej49J8mn1xZKCkpkaYiiQR7YsYhU2EyrEddKTTzlmm RaTZhKyhpBBKpeIq85paznttjXBeGlJZmkO8FEopw2qWXWzbWdC33/v8n//zPv+Xl8LENwkJ pdZoGVajyJaSQrw6zSgLd6hM8r2G+cDYlqEdseUbs0Rsyb1iMrZ5ykEexGUGww+BzDgxJpCt NVSTR7F0YYKKyVbnM2xkYoYwa7DjOZY3Jiyw2S1YEWoUliFfCuh9oLtj9ClDQkpMtyPoW11A bkFMDyN4alS5BZzWY2Cdr8f5rkoBrLzp9R5eINDPNhBuC0knwEPzusfuT3chMN7KcPM2Ohxs mw4fvh4BLyeXvBwNk91OgZtxOgSaTFdIN4vodPja20Pya8RDvWPcM9PXNf/J+DfczYjeDusj LR4vRgfC9GKtgM9Dg2HAhvEcAMsLfwi+XwlrU3oXU656MFiqzvMtyWCwFmHuLECvkDD56wvJ C4fhd73RO1MNTl0dwXM81Ok6vYZuBO9Mrd7LdsLqXL2AFxwE6NumcT4BAw9adYh/CQnYX1/z 8k5YmhkkKlBozX8halwLYnQotPdF8uVgqLo+51PjeRc/sFYv4nUIb0IBHMNxOZnRMREMq1Zy XK4mQsNoO5Hrp5ge/wzvQc2fksyIppB0i6iu5JlcTCjyucIcMwIKk/qL1k+Z5GKRSlF4gWFz T7PnshnOjIIoXBooSlkOlovpTIWWOcMweQz7TxVQvpIiJM7pX6qNP5vC7v4YotRYRkaPdffP tEc5Z/3jrm6o03RK50zyobb7xft3CRIDrdatH45XvL2MjkhibjTGJdtDxvPmfFP1ZQvllUl3 K/smtK96O4q50s+DQXmlfpujdumeA5bvty8+Sm0Js4UFvS+UDZ1sGS7oWu06calqYyCqVzIj xbksRVQYxnKKv6m9KSMlAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/v4Gfrd0dJ5oS4v10aU4LZX5xPpk>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:01:24 -0000

Hi

For what it is worth, ECN handling is described for SCReAM since a while back. 
It is however not yet implemented in the code at (https://github.com/EricssonResearch/scream ), this is however a quite easy task to do and if the interest in SCReAM picks up then I am happy to spend the 2-3 hours that it takes to add ECN support to the code.

/Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Täht [mailto:dave@taht.net]
> Sent: den 26 augusti 2016 08:15
> To: aqm@ietf.org; rmcat@ietf.org; bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: [rmcat] webrtc vs aqm and/or sfq
> 
> Pretty good paper at:
> 
> http://c3lab.poliba.it/images/0/0e/Gcc_aqm.pdf
> 
> I do keep hoping the videoconferencing folk give ecn a shot one day,
> especially for iframes. Has anyone pursued the early line of work for ecn that
> was in nada, or tried to add it to gcc?
> 
> Another hope is that we see more videoconferencing analyses on wifi and at
> higher baseline rates than 2mbit.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email