Re: [rmcat] Second RMCAT WGLC for draft-ietf-rmcat-nada - ends December 21

"Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <> Tue, 13 February 2018 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C98812D86A; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:35:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.529
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6V0oz7BnLgIP; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30C712D878; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:35:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=5159; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518543310; x=1519752910; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EezUcA/nTMGcYzYWWlP3wvMRCV8R9iFeqlcliyG0vok=; b=UvtRm/KLw1ftG45Vv+EC9u26zScvwe5f3QBcHtNdO2TmxUpJbz5483Gz VSGDA0Mw3t/YJcC34kPrgJVBjL1twTpsQpRemcoCMwUFrW3X8aNvbe7Qq h0aDULnShQ2sARF5Q36gMpXdzK6KaKzsokRZhB30puY6fAN3SrlTAlInA o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.46,508,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="69764240"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2018 17:35:10 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1DHZ9tr020442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:35:09 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:35:09 -0600
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:35:09 -0600
From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <>
To: Anna Brunstrom <>, "" <>, "" <>
CC: "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Second RMCAT WGLC for draft-ietf-rmcat-nada - ends December 21
Thread-Index: AQHTbzgLRq0LZ6G+wkOkFqw5N5N1oqOi/+6I
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:35:09 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_151854331125867035ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Second RMCAT WGLC for draft-ietf-rmcat-nada - ends December 21
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:35:13 -0000

Dear WG Chairs,

I would like to check the status of the NADA draft. As I understand the second WGLC is now over.  Just wondering what are the the next steps we shall expect?



From: rmcat <>; on behalf of Anna Brunstrom <>;
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 2:47 AM
Subject: [rmcat] Second RMCAT WGLC for draft-ietf-rmcat-nada - ends December 21

This email announces a second RMCAT Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on:

NADA: A Unified Congestion Control Scheme for Real-Time Media

The purpose of this second WGLC is to give the WG a chance to review the update to the NADA algorithm that was performed as a result of the comments raise during the first WGLC. This second WGLC will run for 2 weeks, ending at midnight US Eastern Time on Thursday, December 21.  Comments should be sent to the<> list.

As previously announced on the list, the authors have made a complete set of NS3 evaluation results for the revised algorithm available via the following Dropbox link: Please note that the 05 version of the draft contains the algorithm updates. The latest 06 version contains further text refinements, but no algorithm changes.

Thanks to all who provided feedback during the first WGLC. Ingemar, Julius, Roland, could you please confirm to the list or to the chairs if the latest version addresses your comments.

(as WG co-chair)