Re: [rmcat] Agenda items for virtual interim?

"Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F67129C36 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HDO21Aa3GHYv for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D35129BB2 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2232; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492104162; x=1493313762; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=0CDFaDpE0Utgq1pN6t4fet6Vl96Yjkqv5yITCPJmk+o=; b=KwmEYLTZ0tef+ijWgfYSfaCKw5ZPoelkNqiLelTGHLBhESbRq12rIDG9 fCoFx1TgNKgpi1GA5hSDYeCqZRYGs3NTXAyrqzGTHa7ftqKPT8hp3PeHU bNZ18OFAPcdQ3jpeQ8RcDAt95u7EgA7+zKcnMBK5qeHhsnOUSUj+9iqjN I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AVAQBAs+9Y/49dJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1OBbAeGK4dHkVeEBAEDkVCCD4YkAoN3PxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUVAQEBAQOBBQQCAQgRBAEBCh4HDyMUCQgCBAESiharGosPAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBIIZRgV2DF4RWhWUBBJA0jFwBkmCBf4UuiheIZ4sdAR84gQVbFYcbdYgjgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,195,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="236215269"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Apr 2017 17:22:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (xch-rcd-018.cisco.com [173.37.102.28]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3DHMfpp024024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:22:41 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:22:41 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:22:41 -0500
From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" <xiaoqzhu@cisco.com>
To: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>, "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Agenda items for virtual interim?
Thread-Index: AQHSryQgzdMKXsKhtU2tIgwamY4ij6G5xnSAgAnPAvA=
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:22:41 +0000
Message-ID: <1492104161061.94631@cisco.com>
References: <d8cc7a94-e1e9-dd93-1c0d-cf796f27e017@kau.se>, <AM3PR07MB292CD5248F4408952A1EA579F0C0@AM3PR07MB292.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM3PR07MB292CD5248F4408952A1EA579F0C0@AM3PR07MB292.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.235.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rmcat/y_G8KPOV7Os9pFLf1CCeTY4gg6s>
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Agenda items for virtual interim?
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rmcat/>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:22:47 -0000

Hi Anna, 

My colleagues and I would like to request the following slots for presentation, approximately 20 minutes each: 

* Update on video-traffic-model draft: new video traffic trace data collected from firefox and corresponding analysis of both transient and steady-state model parameters; 

* Update on ns3-rmcat open source module (as companion to the framework draft):  we are getting close to completing this module and would like to give folks an overview of the codebase structure, example uses and example results; 

* Evaluation of NADA in ns3-rmcat: more comprehensive report on NADA evaluation results as implemented in the ns3-rmcat module, for both wired and wifi test cases. 

Looking forward to the Interim meeting. 

Thanks,
Xiaoqing

________________________________________
From: rmcat <rmcat-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:30 AM
To: Anna Brunstrom; rmcat@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Agenda items for virtual interim?

Hi Anna,

For status on Design team efforts and Feedback message Please allocate minimum 30 mins.

For eval-test drafts , 10 min should be good enough.

BR

Zahed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rmcat [mailto:rmcat-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Anna Brunstrom
> Sent: den 7 april 2017 00:21
> To: rmcat@ietf.org
> Subject: [rmcat] Agenda items for virtual interim?
>
> Dear all,
>
> Our virtual interim is coming up in three weeks. Please let us know of any
> items you would like for the agenda.
>
> We know that we may have an update on both the NADA draft and the video-
> traffic-model draft and we need to discuss the feedback design, but please let
> us know how much time should be allocated for the different topics. From the
> chairs we would also like to discuss what is left to get the eval-criteria and
> eval-test drafts finished up.
>
> Thanks,
> Anna (for the WG chairs)
>