hostTopNDuration has DEFVAL !!?
Robin Iddon <robini@spider.co.uk> Thu, 12 December 1991 12:28 UTC
Received: from mtigate.mti.com by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04637; 12 Dec 91 7:28 EST
Received: by mtigate.mti.com id AA02665 (5.65+/IDA-1.3.5); Thu, 12 Dec 91 03:50:56 -0800
Received: from eros.uknet.ac.uk by mtigate.mti.com with SMTP id AA02661 (5.65+/IDA-1.3.5); Thu, 12 Dec 91 03:50:50 -0800
Received: from festival.edinburgh.ac.uk by eros.uknet.ac.uk via JANET with NIFTP (PP) id <18178-0@eros.uknet.ac.uk>; Thu, 12 Dec 1991 11:42:26 +0000
Received: from spider.co.uk by festival.ed.ac.uk id aa14822; 12 Dec 91 11:38 GMT
Received: by widow.spider.co.uk; Wed, 11 Dec 91 14:04:02 GMT
From: Robin Iddon <robini@spider.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1991 13:59:47 +0000
Message-Id: <8546.9112111359@orbweb.spider.co.uk>
Received: by orbweb.spider.co.uk; Wed, 11 Dec 91 13:59:47 GMT
To: rmonmib@lexcel.com
Subject: hostTopNDuration has DEFVAL !!?
Hi,
In re-reading the hostTopN group from RFC1271 I noticed the following oddity:
[From RFC1271]
hostTopNDuration OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of seconds that this report has collected
during the last sampling interval, or if this
report is currently being collected, the number
of seconds that this report is being collected
during this sampling interval.
When the associated hostTopNTimeRemaining object is
set, this object shall be set by the probe to the
same value and shall not be modified until the next
time the hostTopNTimeRemaining is set.
This value shall be zero if no reports have been
requested for this hostTopNControlEntry."
DEFVAL { 0 }
::= { hostTopNControlEntry 5 }
[End]
The DESCRIPTION says that this object should be zero until the associated
hostTopNRemaining object is set and the object is read-only.
My question is: Should it have a DEFVAL?
Robin
- hostTopNDuration has DEFVAL !!? Robin Iddon