Re: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274)
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Sat, 28 July 2012 23:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FAC21F865E for <rmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojACpeO2gWfq for <rmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (omr13.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C2C21F8661 for <rmt@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr8 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6SN5XtB022335 for <rmt@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:05:33 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr8 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [46.21.99.28] ([46.21.99.28:50776] helo=[10.10.0.126]) by cm-omr8 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id B6/99-04790-93074105; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:05:33 -0400
Message-ID: <50147030.2020105@mti-systems.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:05:20 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20120703062937.A14C872F1C4@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120703062937.A14C872F1C4@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rmt@ietf.org, adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil, m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, kdw@neowiz.com, widmer@acm.org
Subject: Re: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274)
X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport <rmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmt>
List-Post: <mailto:rmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:05:37 -0000
I propose to "Hold for Document Update" on this, based on the IESG errata processing guidelines. It's not necessary, however someone doing a future update might want to consider it. Unless anyone shouts otherwise, I'll put this in later in the week. On 7/3/2012 2:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4654, > "TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4654&eid=3274 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Dongwook Kim <kdw@neowiz.com> > > Section: 5.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > If a loss interval, A, is determined to have started with packet > > sequence number S_A and the next loss interval, B, started with > > packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in loss > > interval A is given by (S_B - S_A). > > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > If a loss event, A, is determined to have started with packet > > sequence number S_A and the next loss event, B, started with > > packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in the loss > > interval between A and B is given by (S_B - S_A). > > > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC4654 (draft-ietf-rmt-bb-tfmcc-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification > Publication Date : August 2006 > Author(s) : J. Widmer, M. Handley > Category : EXPERIMENTAL > Source : Reliable Multicast Transport > Area : Transport > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (32… Wesley Eddy