[Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 03 July 2012 06:30 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D964911E813D for <rmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.448, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id agl8ohfJ6evu for <rmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3346521F854F for <rmt@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A14C872F1C4; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: widmer@acm.org, m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wes@mti-systems.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, lorenzo@vicisano.net, adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120703062937.A14C872F1C4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:29:37 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, kdw@neowiz.com, rmt@ietf.org
Subject: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274)
X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport <rmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmt>
List-Post: <mailto:rmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:30:55 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4654, "TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4654&eid=3274 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dongwook Kim <kdw@neowiz.com> Section: 5.3 Original Text ------------- If a loss interval, A, is determined to have started with packet sequence number S_A and the next loss interval, B, started with packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in loss interval A is given by (S_B - S_A). Corrected Text -------------- If a loss event, A, is determined to have started with packet sequence number S_A and the next loss event, B, started with packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in the loss interval between A and B is given by (S_B - S_A). Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4654 (draft-ietf-rmt-bb-tfmcc-07) -------------------------------------- Title : TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification Publication Date : August 2006 Author(s) : J. Widmer, M. Handley Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Reliable Multicast Transport Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (32… Wesley Eddy