[Rmt] FLUTE v2

<Rod.Walsh@nokia.com> Mon, 09 May 2011 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Rod.Walsh@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715E3E077E for <rmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ghKJaOXWzVL for <rmt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894B8E077C for <rmt@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-da02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p49Bdhtq004377 for <rmt@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:39:57 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 9 May 2011 14:39:40 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.106]) by nok-am1mhub-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) with mapi; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:39:40 +0200
From: <Rod.Walsh@nokia.com>
To: <rmt@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:39:44 +0200
Thread-Topic: FLUTE v2
Thread-Index: AcwOPce/nj8EBm4mQ4qFjHTwA5ZJ0A==
Message-ID: <484630C0-8527-4A25-970A-A51739BCCCC3@nokia.com>
References: <20110506054943.29436.39522.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110506054943.29436.39522.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2011 11:39:40.0650 (UTC) FILETIME=[C87F94A0:01CC0E3D]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: [Rmt] FLUTE v2
X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport <rmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmt>
List-Post: <mailto:rmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 14:27:44 -0000

Hi all

It's pretty clear that as a group and individuals we are short of the energy and determination to tie-up every loose thread of the RMT adventure. For me, the one and only issue preventing FLUTE staying at the sensible and consistent v1 status was highlight by Mike...

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmt/current/msg01513.html

...running through all the specs and the multitude of related SDO adoptions takes a lot of footwork and singular dedication. I'm am not in such a position to do that nowadays. Even running through the maze of security IDs and RFCs to get FLUTE-SDP finished has taken months to get done on-the-side.

So unless we have an energetic and enthusiastic spec miner who is willing to take on the task Mike pointed out, then I propose we push forward to a v1.1.

(just kidding, we should all the way to 1.9 :)

And thus, with Jani's energy and hard work, I can focus on the finished flute-SDP (coming any day now).

Cheers, Rod.