[Rmt] 80th IETF - Prague - RMT meeting necessity poll
brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil Wed, 09 February 2011 21:29 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil>
X-Original-To: rmt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9429F3A6925 for <rmt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZHYyHdzhef8 for <rmt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.83.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC0D3A6866 for <rmt@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3]) by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id p19LTADx018215; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:29:10 -0500
Received: from macsimus.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.92.151]) by smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.16.48) with SMTP id M2011020916290910401 ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:29:09 -0500
From: brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:28:26 -0500
Message-Id: <224DB58C-8955-45C8-9435-AB68C821B6B7@nrl.navy.mil>
To: rmt@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Brian Adamson <Brian.Adamson@nrl.navy.mil>
Subject: [Rmt] 80th IETF - Prague - RMT meeting necessity poll
X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport <rmt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmt>
List-Post: <mailto:rmt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt>, <mailto:rmt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:29:02 -0000
From mailing list activity, etc, it _seems_ to me that we are closing in on the final RMT items and it seems to be proceeding OK. My personal opinion is an RMT meeting in Prague may not be necessary? But I wanted to poll the mailing list for opinions as to whether a formal meeting is warranted. I currently plan to go to Prague for other IETF purposes and will be happy to discuss any RMT matters with anyone else even if we don't have a formal meeting. Please post your opinions on this to the RMT mailing list. best regards, Brian Adamson brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil
- [Rmt] 80th IETF - Prague - RMT meeting necessity … brian.adamson