Return-Path: X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E984221F9D05 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:16:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuwSYDyIAI9S for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from barvaux.org (mout.barvaux.org [94.23.206.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7FD21F9D04 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:16:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25959 invoked by uid 210); 28 Apr 2013 19:15:59 -0000 Received: from lnantes-156-75-100-102.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr by mout (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.08st (clamdscan: 0.97.7/17104. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.08st. Clear:RC:1(80.12.84.102):. Processed in 0.01138 secs); 28 Apr 2013 19:15:59 -0000 Received: from lnantes-156-75-100-102.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO shou.barvaux.org) (80.12.84.102) by mout.barvaux.org with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted); 28 Apr 2013 19:15:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:15:34 +0200 From: Didier Barvaux To: rohc@ietf.org Message-ID: <20130428211534.5bcf5db4@shou.barvaux.org> In-Reply-To: <1CDAE328E159DA4991D66B8BD50735701A1A1BE6@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> References: <1CDAE328E159DA4991D66B8BD50735701A1A1BE6@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.12; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/XXC1NSSRImLado97uQ_XZsT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [rohc] FYI: ROHC-TCP update => RFC6846 X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: rohc@ietf.org List-Id: Robust Header Compression List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:16:03 -0000 --Sig_/XXC1NSSRImLado97uQ_XZsT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kristofer, > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:39:46 +0000, > Kristofer Sandlund wrote: > > Just FYI for anyone still reading this list, the ROHC-TCP update was > published last month, obsoleting RFC4996. Hopefully, we managed to > iron out the bugs that were left. I took some time to answer you, but I would like to thank you for the update. It helped me a lot with SACK options 2 months ago! There was a problem when the ROHC implementation I maintain was (de)compressing them. Implementing the updated RFC fixed the problem :) Regards, Didier --=20 Opensource ROHC library - http://rohc-lib.org/ --Sig_/XXC1NSSRImLado97uQ_XZsT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRfXVWAAoJENcWJ60bK7nBRLgP/0YyfOPhRZ0f9Ni9kTZhgObV XJETCQOCAz5XBxoWIn+ICB/eI+GsLtPlshqSh2FhNt3jpnkYtx9GeMCRYfIsujlT RA+fCKfXQjBPlQNarBLtnYyVtDE2miVPSyqUCFSq/l7691Rs8kBIIc/I/pVTz7wV BjLgOMsy+icFepZgC8bpwQW4lmUAJxE/29SRfyFAYiBrbYQ2XMPAnb1k06hV8D2o oQz1LCg6EtZ745V6T6hysooHbxK1+Q2wFpXlsk9Mbu3AVNgntKwGaECXpMfSjtrm dsvRfDd48WYq3ikmZlzNjNbcmeKKd31mpQ8toUmIJLg0DpRM2cVuY4qeQktI6pTS O0IXk4b2QRJLNfIxhYtc0UIbB2t4cCHgoapyifP5Y0MYndl/EsW2iWpjup6u4btZ zHKQulSihFr00WFdnhHxsHMGA3y5Z8Bof1XdPIHubi3EzzS4fYriIvXczS4anxfG 90EpoFcZqix+oFWgJ2mc6PIF0Yw+ZBpuYlHybshmJXf4jm6saJ93PD7l+jttlUi3 TDkzwaGzCLrzc7MEAjGsfxECib7w+lEtxBM+KPBn0L+d28NosYUNdhn2/qZRuJyt evuI24Xxh61HWpKqQxAeTFZ6nwTW8bN5O760rCPuLeujhWQaQqalIpUpsi+BGCs/ ZN2KvBWzGVhiTI3vn+ka =3ZY8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/XXC1NSSRImLado97uQ_XZsT--