IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [rohc] non-default capabilities

"Dr. Carsten Bormann" <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 18 February 2002 13:12 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA01873 for <rohc-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:12:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA18975; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:09:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA18897 for <rohc@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:08:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (root@nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.3]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA01760 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:07:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cabo3 (root@nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.3]) by nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id g1ID7m426400; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:07:48 +0100 (MET)
From: "Dr. Carsten Bormann" <cabo@tzi.org>
To: "Lawrence Conroy" <lwc@roke.co.uk>, <richard.price@roke.co.uk>, <Hans.Hannu@epl.ericsson.se>
Cc: <rohc@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [rohc] non-default capabilities
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:07:48 +0100
Message-ID: <NFBBJFHGMCFINEMHAMBGOEGEHHAA.cabo@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <p05100300b896a7d0bb91@[193.118.192.80]>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: rohc-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rohc-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I ASSUME that there will be a default, mandatory unencumbered 
> algorithm that is known
> to be supported and so this doesn't need to be reported

After the recent discussion, I'm not sure this is the current 
consensus of the WG.

Gruesse, Carsten



_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email