[rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2109)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 05 April 2010 10:33 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6F8C63A68D7 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.115,
BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuCqDRYVlcyh for
<rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC9D3A68D4 for <rohc@ietf.org>;
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 28016E07A6;
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com, ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com,
lars-erik@lejonsson.com, ietfdbh@comcast.net, lars.eggert@nokia.com,
carl.knutsson@effnet.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100405103312.28016E07A6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rohc@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2109)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:33:14 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5795, "The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5795&eid=2109 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 5.1.2, pg.17 Original Text ------------- [[ first paragraph on page 17: ]] PROFILES: Set of non-negative integers, where each integer indicates a profile supported by both the compressor and the decompressor. A | profile is identified by a 16-bit value, where the 8 LSB bits | indicate the actual profile, and the 8 MSB bits indicate the variant of that profile. The ROHC compressed header format identifies the | profile used with only the 8 LSB bits; this means that if multiple variants of the same profile are available for a ROHC channel, the PROFILES set after negotiation MUST NOT include more than one variant of the same profile. The compressor MUST NOT compress using a profile that is not in PROFILES. Corrected Text -------------- PROFILES: Set of non-negative integers, where each integer indicates a profile supported by both the compressor and the decompressor. A | profile is identified by a 16-bit value, where the 8 LSBs indicate | the actual profile, and the 8 MSBs indicate the variant of that profile. The ROHC compressed header format identifies the profile | used with only the 8 LSBs; this means that if multiple variants of the same profile are available for a ROHC channel, the PROFILES set after negotiation MUST NOT include more than one variant of the same profile. The compressor MUST NOT compress using a profile that is not in PROFILES. Notes ----- Rationale: Abuse of language; the acronym definitions in Section 2.1 clearly say: LSB Least Significant Bit. ... MSB Most Significant Bit. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5795 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc4995bis-03) -------------------------------------- Title : The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework Publication Date : March 2010 Author(s) : K. Sandlund, G. Pelletier, L-E. Jonsson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Robust Header Compression Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2109) RFC Errata System