[rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2109)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 05 April 2010 10:33 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8C63A68D7 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuCqDRYVlcyh for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC9D3A68D4 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 28016E07A6; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com, ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com, lars-erik@lejonsson.com, ietfdbh@comcast.net, lars.eggert@nokia.com, carl.knutsson@effnet.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100405103312.28016E07A6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rohc@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2109)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:33:14 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5795,
"The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5795&eid=2109

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>

Section: 5.1.2, pg.17

Original Text
-------------
[[  first paragraph on page 17: ]]

   PROFILES: Set of non-negative integers, where each integer indicates
   a profile supported by both the compressor and the decompressor.  A
|  profile is identified by a 16-bit value, where the 8 LSB bits
|  indicate the actual profile, and the 8 MSB bits indicate the variant
   of that profile.  The ROHC compressed header format identifies the
|  profile used with only the 8 LSB bits; this means that if multiple
   variants of the same profile are available for a ROHC channel, the
   PROFILES set after negotiation MUST NOT include more than one variant
   of the same profile.  The compressor MUST NOT compress using a
   profile that is not in PROFILES.


Corrected Text
--------------
   PROFILES:  Set of non-negative integers, where each integer indicates
   a profile supported by both the compressor and the decompressor.  A
|  profile is identified by a 16-bit value, where the 8 LSBs indicate
|  the actual profile, and the 8 MSBs indicate the variant of that
   profile.  The ROHC compressed header format identifies the profile
|  used with only the 8 LSBs; this means that if multiple variants of
   the same profile are available for a ROHC channel, the PROFILES set
   after negotiation MUST NOT include more than one variant of the same
   profile.  The compressor MUST NOT compress using a profile that is
   not in PROFILES.


Notes
-----
Rationale:  Abuse of language;
  the acronym definitions in Section 2.1 clearly say:
     LSB    Least Significant Bit.
     ...
     MSB    Most Significant Bit.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5795 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc4995bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework
Publication Date    : March 2010
Author(s)           : K. Sandlund, G. Pelletier, L-E. Jonsson
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Robust Header Compression
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG