[rohc] Query regarding RFC 6846
Aneesh J <aneeshj09@gmail.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 12:17 UTC
Return-Path: <aneeshj09@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F893A101A for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 04:17:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnBF1zZoiicp for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 04:17:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 715A73A1018 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 04:17:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id w1so9291690ejf.11 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 04:17:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=re9ppiOhS8GgN+PrCAgj1ENUAWCJdHRMfqMh3CHQTOE=; b=LJ9ETRStg0eGMEVydnSdTaj6xs9vzGtQo0nh+lCKWHxIoqhWznN/obs9eVVCpZJoZe sWbgek8okCeWtgf1FM8bvgFQQC9AKCZcyLKedImhstyrs+fCVkmAKE2lG7OOdPm7IGKn AnowCsm0fmG+555AGT5Va/sQcIhSfnN0S4nmE+260JOW++3fB7FppuY4uUY4vmC6WZ2P MCPvyEUvFUamEmYqkzCLpV6Xac6OmIsm4ORilVmLyUldDXtmT66+/AOxibFPAvBFImLJ qbUFGAbw7ekjIJRDimxyiJq7jtIQsXLKycKdnnmii9yQY+0ZClfYbgY4pJCJlvOL7aEA lfdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=re9ppiOhS8GgN+PrCAgj1ENUAWCJdHRMfqMh3CHQTOE=; b=I7jY0d4+pZ/gYOu391aUTQSkHz/HtKw1S+eWAueEc9ELrqJhWdkLIEsS38tmfYQvhQ G9CiPEWAERCzq+v6JJOU7ujhNZ23FjSs80ik+yb9kx+rsTCbkcXjGXtms/qkr9p0KRaH /RKh7/PeGS3EqIl+U2lY/gzgl3FVhJ0fGMk4RlcMvA6TB5Qdjy9Mg9UN0qu72gk+V5cX Ikwe9CxfPtqOjACMFDD+KKI9BVLP01CBIDXltExVAXsDMovIfaR4n9dRSqQlGcGNfbq7 LTLp10He9UCQuNWmD3ARVuS9JA8GRvl/OB54w6Zq8F6ypfcucr4jnMhT/k8FUs0itASN 542w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53290nmDKdeEjjSjjvFEhM+YXHZ7mX34SzxBZLKnCUef/x1E4bXJ 3TnZOVZRFYaJGVD9YXR9NxJhL0PlLeNnLl9k7f5upix6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzfaMi1bXo2AKLFRDVoHm8CHsFbW2oS91Cy1HyYw/czDX1MT028bMxCllCABNYIYrgIBBsVV5lAcTQsfO4PgI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ae0c:: with SMTP id le12mr6111444ejb.283.1610021847713; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 04:17:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Aneesh J <aneeshj09@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:47:16 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB+1qiJbjfDbYJjteMWo0oW+4aWr6O-Ywtjc58EuVtFuW7z9MQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: rohc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050498c05b84e6cc7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rohc/8_8hz_yB046itrmyCnkf-8iSDWg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:50:24 -0800
Subject: [rohc] Query regarding RFC 6846
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rohc/>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:38:59 -0000
Dear All, I have a query regarding TCP- RST/SYN/FIN (RSF flags) compression. Presence of these flags can be indicated via a compressed packet of type co_common OR rnd_8 OR seq_8. If these flags are not present in next (N+1th)packet, How it should be indicated? Could you please advise which is expected (a) or (b) from RFC 6846? a) Sent again either of these compressed packet types with RST_NONE to indicate explicit clear. b) Any other packet type (say rnd_1 to rnd_7)and flag is reset implicitly. In other words indicate flags presence is enough? or reset also to be indicated? OpenRohc Handles even with (b). While some other decompressor implementations expect (a) Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thank you, Regards Aneesh
- [rohc] Query regarding RFC 6846 Aneesh J