Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5858 (2276)
Robert Stangarone <rstangarone-ietf@whataboutbob.org> Fri, 21 May 2010 13:16 UTC
Return-Path: <rstangarone-ietf@whataboutbob.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id D6FF03A9B44 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 May 2010 06:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.712,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JTTUHbY2-0XY for
<rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2010 06:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (fed1rmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.241.40])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4BF3A7624 for <rohc@ietf.org>;
Fri, 21 May 2010 01:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net
(InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id
<20100521085343.QXQB1296.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>;
Fri, 21 May 2010 04:53:43 -0400
Received: from proxy.whataboutbob.org ([70.181.136.249]) by
fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id L8u11e0015P1so6038u18M;
Fri, 21 May 2010 04:54:01 -0400
X-VR-Score: -80.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=J3o2LjFkw/E22IlEgQUY/UQPCs18Jo95jye/5rN+HKE=
c=1 sm=1 a=Biomr7naiMIA:10 a=hO-oPbc3tlwA:10 a=ORa4HqFjfvEA:10
a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=pjkzafCEHxwb+sheQ3qqNQ==:17 a=BqEg4_3jAAAA:8
a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=W9s-aqxmAAAA:8 a=1WcC3xeeEieoROvcLUIA:9
a=fMIJBXi35Hcx2r7BFwYA:7 a=tYSKj8auGa4U5gGjmEkQqiEXCvQA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
a=oehdNtOHeC8A:10 a=mhd2NDuUijAA:10 a=zUDZw1waNiIA:10 a=Pk3S22Ty8a4A:10
a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=o-jx0KfhdQsA:10 a=pjkzafCEHxwb+sheQ3qqNQ==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
proxy.whataboutbob.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C94F017B;
Fri, 21 May 2010 04:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at whataboutbob.org
Received: from proxy.whataboutbob.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(proxy.whataboutbob.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id
5G+sGg+UAeT5; Fri, 21 May 2010 04:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
proxy.whataboutbob.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C124F017D;
Fri, 21 May 2010 04:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.75] (sentinel.whataboutbob.org [192.168.2.75]) by
proxy.whataboutbob.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 362674F017B;
Fri, 21 May 2010 04:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BF64A09.3030905@whataboutbob.org>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 01:53:29 -0700
From: Robert Stangarone <rstangarone-ietf@whataboutbob.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20100519125950.C78DFE0655@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100519125950.C78DFE0655@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 May 2010 00:19:03 -0700
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rohc@ietf.org, rstangarone-ietf@whataboutbob.org,
christou_chris@bah.com, cabo@tzi.org, ietfdbh@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5858 (2276)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:16:04 -0000
Agreed. Nice catch again. Bob On 05/19/2010 05:59 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5858, > "IPsec Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5858&eid=2276 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> > > Section: 3.2, pg. 5 > > Original Text > ------------- > The data items contained within the SAD are defined in RFC 4301 > [IPSEC], Section 4.4.2.1. To support ROHC, the SAD must include a > | "ROHC Data Item"; this data item contains parameters used by ROHC > instance. The ROHC Data Item exists for both inbound and outbound > SAs. > > The ROHC Data Item includes the ROHC channel parameters for the SA. > These channel parameters (i.e., MAX_CID, PROFILES, MRRU) are > enumerated above in Section 3.1. For inbound SAs, the ROHC Data Item > MUST specify the ROHC channel parameters that are used by the local > decompressor instance; conversely, for outbound SAs, the ROHC Data > | Item MUST specify the ROHC channel parameters that are used by local > compressor instance. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The data items contained within the SAD are defined in RFC 4301 > [IPSEC], Section 4.4.2.1. To support ROHC, the SAD must include a > | "ROHC Data Item"; this data item contains parameters used by the ROHC > instance. The ROHC Data Item exists for both inbound and outbound > SAs. > > The ROHC Data Item includes the ROHC channel parameters for the SA. > These channel parameters (i.e., MAX_CID, PROFILES, MRRU) are > enumerated above in Section 3.1. For inbound SAs, the ROHC Data Item > MUST specify the ROHC channel parameters that are used by the local > decompressor instance; conversely, for outbound SAs, the ROHC Data > | Item MUST specify the ROHC channel parameters that are used by the > local compressor instance. > > > Notes > ----- > Rationale: missing definite article (2 instances) > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5858 (draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : IPsec Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec > Publication Date : May 2010 > Author(s) : E. Ertekin, C. Christou, C. Bormann > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Robust Header Compression > Area : Transport > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > Rohc mailing list > Rohc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc > ************************************************************************ > This mail originated from the whataboutbob.org domain. > For any issues related to this mail, or the whataboutbob.org > domain, contact support@whataboutbob.org > > Processed by .25 > ************************************************************************ > ************************************************************************ This mail originated from the whataboutbob.org domain. For any issues related to this mail, or the whataboutbob.org domain, contact support@whataboutbob.org Processed by .254 ************************************************************************
- [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5858 (2276) RFC Errata System
- Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5858 (2… Robert Stangarone