RE: SigComp Requirements (was Re: [rohc] RE: Default decompressio n algorithms)

Carsten

High-level requirements should not be affected by a particular proposed
implementation or solution, hence they ought to pre-date any proposed
solution. 

Thanks

Kevan Hobbis

-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Carsten Bormann [mailto:cabo@tzi.org]
Sent: 27 February 2002 13:47
To: Miguel A. Garcia
Cc: zhigang.c.liu@nokia.com; rohc@ietf.org
Subject: RE: SigComp Requirements (was Re: [rohc] RE: Default
decompression algorithms)

Miguel,

does this list of requirements take into account the UDVM approach?
It does seem to predate its adoption.

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc

_______________________________________________________________

If this email isn't for you then we'd be grateful if you could let our
helpdesk know there's been a mistake by putting 'received in 
error' in the subject box and sending it to helpdesk@hutchison3g.com. 
If it isn't for you, we're sure you'll understand that you're not 
allowed to copy, disclose or distribute any of its contents.  
This email is private and confidential and may also be privileged,
so if you shouldn't have received it, we'd be grateful if you could delete it.
Thanks.
________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc