[rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2108)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 05 April 2010 10:27 UTC

To: kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com, ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com, lars-erik@lejonsson.com, ietfdbh@comcast.net, lars.eggert@nokia.com, carl.knutsson@effnet.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100405102752.06D59E07A5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 03:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rohc@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2108)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5795,
"The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5795&eid=2108

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>

Section: 3.2

Original Text
-------------
[[  last paragraph on page 9: ]]

|  An enhanced variant of CRTP, called eCRTP [RFC3545], means to improve
   the robustness of CRTP in the presence of reordering and packet
   losses, while keeping the protocol almost unchanged from CRTP.  As a
   result, eCRTP does provide better means to implement some degree of
   robustness, albeit at the expense of additional overhead, leading to
   a reduction in compression efficiency in comparison to CRTP.



Corrected Text
--------------
|  An enhanced variant of CRTP, called eCRTP [RFC3545], introduces means
   to improve the robustness of CRTP in the presence of reordering and
   packet losses, while keeping the protocol almost unchanged from CRTP.
   As a result, eCRTP does provide better means to implement some degree
   of robustness, albeit at the expense of additional overhead, leading
   to a reduction in compression efficiency in comparison to CRTP.


Notes
-----
Rationale: missing verb (legacy).

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5795 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc4995bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework
Publication Date    : March 2010
Author(s)           : K. Sandlund, G. Pelletier, L-E. Jonsson
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Robust Header Compression
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2108) RFC Errata System
Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2… Carsten Bormann