Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2108)
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 06 April 2010 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7EEBD3A6A3E for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YU+f0k9wifxq for
<rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de
[IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9:209:3dff:fe00:7136]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with
ESMTP id D408928C1D5 for <rohc@ietf.org>;
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de
(smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by
informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o35H85XL025869;
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:08:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.101] (p5489B710.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.183.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate
requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id
39317E464; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100405102752.06D59E07A5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:08:02 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DEC65FEC-25A5-4713-907F-E3171FAB4C38@tzi.org>
References: <20100405102752.06D59E07A5@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, rohc@ietf.org, lars-erik@lejonsson.com,
ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com, ietfdbh@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2108)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:32:21 -0000
On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:27, RFC Errata System wrote: > means to improve Not an error. "means" is used as a synonym of "intends" here, i.e. as a statement of purpose. (My impression from reading this is that, by using this slightly stilted language, the authors wanted to subtly express their reservations on whether the reported intention actually succeeded.) Gruesse, Carsten
- [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2108) RFC Errata System
- Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5795 (2… Carsten Bormann