Re: [rohc] [multipathtcp] MPTCP and ROHC

[Yoshifumi Nishida <[e-mail]>]

+1.
I think the only difference between MPTCP packets and non-MPTCP TCP packets
is MPTCP option.
Also, MPTCP option should be no less than another kind of TCP option.
if there's any concerns on this, it'll be an interesting point for
discussions.
--
Yoshi

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:44 PM West, Mark <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>
> It’s been a long time, but… ROHC-TCP should work with MPTCP (although I’ve
> never tested it). ROHC can handle ‘generic’ TCP options (i.e. those for
> which there’s no optimised  compressor  behaviour; that would include all
> MPTCP options) and in other respects should be transparent: if a header
> field changes in an unexpected way, the compressor will end up sending a
> less efficient (or even uncompressed) representation. So I haven’t thought
> about the implications for the compression ratio – but it shouldn’t break.
>
>
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: DSEi - Exhibiting at stand S1-310]
> <https://www.dsei.co.uk/welcome>
>
> Follow Us: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/roke-manor-research>
> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/rokemanor> | Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/rokemanor>
>
> Roke Manor Research Limited, Romsey, Hampshire, SO51 0ZN, United Kingdom.
> Part of the Chemring Group. Registered in England & Wales. Registered No:
> 00267550. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is
> proprietary to Roke Manor Research Limited and must not be passed to any
> third party without permission. This communication is for information only
> and shall not create or change any contractual relationship.
> www.roke.co.uk
> <http://www.roke.co.uk/?utm_source=Roke&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Company%20Signature&utm_campaign=Roke>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Rohc [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of *Border, John
> *Sent:* 12 September 2019 21:11
> *To:* Yoshifumi Nishida
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [rohc] [multipathtcp] MPTCP and ROHC
>
>
>
> The latter.
>
>
>
> *From:* Yoshifumi Nishida <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 12, 2019 3:46 AM
> *To:* Border, John <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [multipathtcp] MPTCP and ROHC
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> Hi John,
>
> Do you mean whether we can compress MPTCP options with ROHC or just MPTCP
> won't break ROHC?
>
> --
>
> Yoshi
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:26 AM Border, John <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Does ROHC work with MPTCP?
>
>
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_multipathtcp&d=DwMFaQ&c=dIKa1mMv92xhhFzVXv5A3Q&r=9F44ji63_2hvW5HufmlpP-DFKXuFy4jDtL5PXwKlTqg&m=r8FoosS9r5k8j4FLwQ_iuAeeuWLM7tRjWDDnCADTVGM&s=YO-lkzCO6o1DwCPEXY54s5u8wQcJwhe2aWqzIdiU5PQ&e=>
>
>