Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 11 April 2012 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CBD11E808F for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNttNQ7p2rBE for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BA621F8526 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3BCK6JK018903; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dynamic-218-h.informatik.uni-bremen.de (dynamic-218-h.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6806E35D; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:20:06 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <907C924E-3F57-465C-855B-7BD4703802ED@tzi.org>
References: <20120411091703.C75D76218A@rfc-editor.org> <61D017C9E2225D4A974A141907F3CD104A84CDE06F@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se>
To: Kristofer Sandlund <kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "rohc@ietf.org" <rohc@ietf.org>, "wes@mti-systems.com" <wes@mti-systems.com>, "ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com" <ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com>, "martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu" <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "rohc_team@dialine.fr" <rohc_team@dialine.fr>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3185)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:20:20 -0000

On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:57, Kristofer Sandlund wrote:

> I'd recommend setting the errata as "Verified", whoever has permission
> to edit that one.

Indeed.  To corroborate (grepping for rtp_version):

rfc5225.txt:3570:    rtp_version =:= uncompressed_value(2, 0) [  2 ];
rfc5225.txt:4354:    rtp_version =:= uncompressed_value(2, 2)           [  2 ];
rfc5225.txt:4391:    rtp_version    =:= uncompressed_value(2, 2)        [   2 ];
rfc5225.txt:5137:    rtp_version    =:= uncompressed_value(2, 2)        [  2 ];
rfc5225.txt:5173:    rtp_version =:= uncompressed_value(2, 2)           [   2 ];

Very clearly, line 3570 is the odd one out here and needs to be fixed, as RTP Version 0 is neither defined nor in use.

rohc_team: 
Thanks for finding this!
(If I still were rohc WG chair, I would ask you for your common name at this point, as it is customary to use wallet names on IETF lists.)

Grüße, Carsten