IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [rohc] RE: Default decompression algorithms

"Abbie Barbir"<abbieb@nortelnetworks.com> Fri, 22 February 2002 12:33 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA29617 for <rohc-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:33:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18394; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:27:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18363 for <rohc@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:27:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcars0m9.ca.nortel.com (zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com [47.129.242.157]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA29368 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:27:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcars04f.ca.nortel.com (zcars04f.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.57]) by zcars0m9.ca.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id g1MCQoh05147; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:26:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcard015.ca.nortel.com (zcard015.ca.nortel.com [47.129.30.7]) by zcars04f.ca.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id g1MCQmK18621; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard015.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <FAMDST0K>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:26:50 -0500
Message-ID: <87609AFB433BD5118D5E0002A52CD754015D60EE@zcard0k6.ca.nortel.com>
From: "Abbie Barbir"<abbieb@nortelnetworks.com>
To: "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" <Lars-Erik.Jonsson@epl.ericsson.se>, "'Price, Richard'" <richard.price@roke.co.uk>
Cc: rohc@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [rohc] RE: Default decompression algorithms
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:26:54 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1BB9C.367F4FD0"
Sender: rohc-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rohc-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL) 
> [mailto:Lars-Erik.Jonsson@epl.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:55 AM
> To: 'Price, Richard'
> Cc: rohc@ietf.org
> Subject: [rohc] RE: Default decompression algorithms
> 
> 
> Richard,
> 
> > > LEJ: why should WE make any algorithm
> > >      mandatory at the decompressor.
> > 
> > RP: We shouldn't - in my opinion it would be a mistake for the 
> >     ROHC Working Group to do more than standardise the algorithms
> >     themselves. The final decision on whether algorithms are
> >     mandatory or optional should be made in the context of a
> >     particular application.
> 
> OK, then we do not have a disagreement. This was not clear from
> your previous posting:
> 
sounds good, standadise the algorithm themselevs and let the application
specify the default one.

ps: what would this imply in terms of interoperability testing and
compliance from this WG. This include:
1. UDVM compliance
2. Actual algorithm compliance

abbie

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email