IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: SigComp Requirements (was Re: [rohc] RE: Default decompression algorithms)

zhigang.c.liu@nokia.com Thu, 28 February 2002 16:22 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01455 for <rohc-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:22:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA09408; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:17:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA09357 for <rohc@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:17:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mgw-dax2.ext.nokia.com (mgw-dax2.ext.nokia.com [63.78.179.217]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01085 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:17:35 -0500 (EST)
From: zhigang.c.liu@nokia.com
Received: from davir04nok.americas.nokia.com (davir04nok.americas.nokia.com [172.18.242.87]) by mgw-dax2.ext.nokia.com (Switch-2.1.0/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id g1SGJjx26271 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:19:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (unverified) by davir04nok.americas.nokia.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id <T5958a76783ac12f257079@davir04nok.americas.nokia.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:17:35 -0600
Received: from daebe005.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.18.242.203]) by daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:16:47 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: RE: SigComp Requirements (was Re: [rohc] RE: Default decompression algorithms)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:16:46 -0600
Message-ID: <DE0842B293FC4847992F9EDF8D72E1ED24A26B@daebe005.NOE.Nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: SigComp Requirements (was Re: [rohc] RE: Default decompression algorithms)
Thread-Index: AcHAK1m46zkuqSWUSE6AAHG8eOOc8gARu0gg
To: <Miguel.A.Garcia@ericsson.com>
Cc: <richard.price@roke.co.uk>, <cabo@tzi.org>, <Lars-Erik.Jonsson@epl.ericsson.se>, <rohc@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2002 16:16:47.0278 (UTC) FILETIME=[5202ECE0:01C1C073]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id LAA09378
Sender: rohc-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rohc-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

> > 2) Here we are talking about a simple optimization to
> > reduce the latency. Does anyone has comment on it?
> > 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/rohc/current/
> msg00065.html
> 
> I like this text, and I think it should be covered somewhere
> in the next version of the Sigcomp draft.
> 
> There is a minor thing for discussion though. In step 3 you
> are assuming that the compressor selects the algorithm prior
> to contacint the decompressor. 

No, that's not my assumption. In step 3, all the compressor
does is to see if there is a match and then make a decision.
I rushed the text so it may not be clear on that. I can 
reword it. Your example certainly makes sense to me.

BR,
Zhigang

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email