[rohc] RFC4815 no TS bits
Jer-ming Lin <cs202050@csie.ncu.edu.tw> Wed, 03 February 2010 13:09 UTC
Return-Path: <cs202050@csie.ncu.edu.tw>
X-Original-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id D5A903A6907 for <rohc@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:09:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.336
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=1.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
HELO_EQ_TW=1.335]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eaKiOQ7-0ity for
<rohc@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.csie.ncu.edu.tw (relay.csie.ncu.edu.tw [140.115.50.18])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D193A685A for <rohc@ietf.org>;
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by relay.csie.ncu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 2949) id 5A8FEFD114;
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:10:14 +0800 (CST)
Received: from relay.csie.ncu.edu.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
relay.csie.ncu.edu.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D84FD0ED for <rohc@ietf.org>;
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:10:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from localhost (webmail.csie.ncu.edu.tw [140.115.50.22])
(Authenticated sender: cs202050) by relay.csie.ncu.edu.tw (Postfix) with
ESMTP id 6C424FD0E9 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:10:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from pcs17.cs.nctu.edu.tw (pcs17.cs.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.214.120])
by webmail.csie.ncu.edu.tw (Horde MIME library) with HTTP;
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:07:41 +0800
Message-ID: <20100203210741.gfnig61ao84wsgo0@webmail.csie.ncu.edu.tw>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:07:41 +0800
From: Jer-ming Lin <cs202050@csie.ncu.edu.tw>
To: rohc@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.7
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:05:18 -0800
Subject: [rohc] RFC4815 no TS bits
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>,
<mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:34:52 -0000
Dear ROHCer,
In the RFC4815 4.2 "When no TS bits are received in the
compressed header, the scaled TS value is reconstructed assuming a
linear extrapolation from the SN, i.e., delta_TS = delta_SN *
default-slope, where delta_SN and delta_TS are both signed integers."
Does that mean the decompressor must receive at least one scaled
TS before get no-TS bits? How about absolute TS or unscaled TS? Since
the decompressor can derive the scaled TS directly when it gets the
unscaled TS, the compressor can send several unscaled TS to establish
the TS_STRIDE and the relationship of delta_TS. Is that right?
Sincerely,
Jer-ming
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
- [rohc] RFC4815 no TS bits Jer-ming Lin
- Re: [rohc] RFC4815 no TS bits Carl Knutsson
- Re: [rohc] RFC4815 no TS bits Jer-ming Lin