IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Application Statement

Juha Heinanen <Juha.Heinanen@lohi.dat.tele.fi> Sat, 04 March 1995 14:51 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02617; 4 Mar 95 9:51 EST
Received: from acton.timeplex.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02613; 4 Mar 95 9:51 EST
Received: from lohi.dat.tele.fi (lohi.dat.tele.fi [131.177.104.142]) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.9/ACTON-MAIN-1.2) with SMTP id JAA27836 for <rolc@acton.timeplex.com>; Sat, 4 Mar 1995 09:45:26 -0500
Message-Id: <199503041445.JAA27836@maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com>
Received: from lohi.dat.tele.fi by lohi.dat.tele.fi id <29472-0@lohi.dat.tele.fi>; Sat, 4 Mar 1995 16:45:47 +0200
To: curtis@ans.net
CC: dhc2@gte.com, curtis@ans.net, rolc@acton.timeplex.com
In-reply-to: <199503032024.PAA01043@curtis.ansremote.com>
Subject: Re: Application Statement
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 1995 16:45:47 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Juha Heinanen <Juha.Heinanen@lohi.dat.tele.fi>
X-Orig-Sender: Juha.Heinanen@lohi.dat.tele.fi

   There are many people involved in the operation of the Internet that
   feel that NHRP is not at all viable except as an address resolution
   protocol.

if this were true, then i don't see much sense in deploying nhrp, since
nbma arp as an address resolution protocol is much simpler.

-- juha

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email