Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 26 October 1995 22:12 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25772; 26 Oct 95 18:12 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25768; 26 Oct 95 18:12 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com ([204.249.99.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA29142; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:44:15 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA15488 for rolc-out; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:54:40 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA15479 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:54:36 -0400
Received: from stilton.cisco.com (stilton.cisco.com [171.69.1.161]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA29135 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 17:43:06 -0400
Received: from [171.69.126.203] (sl-chary-01.cisco.com [171.69.126.203]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA27487; Thu, 26 Oct 1995 14:47:08 -0700
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v0213050dacb5adc2286e@[171.69.126.203]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 14:47:17 -0700
To: Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.dat.tele.fi>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
Cc: curtis@ans.net, rolc@nexen.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

At 10:03 AM 10/26/95, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>is the fairness assumption built in into int-serv/rsvp, i.e., are the
>routers required to isolate flows of "best effort" category from each
>other?  also, is it possible in int-serv/rsvp to specify a weight for a
>best effort flow relative to other flows sharing the same path?

no, but I can tell you of implementations that do...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
...Every morning is the dawn of a new error...