Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary
"Andrew G. Malis" <malis@nexen.com> Wed, 23 August 1995 21:53 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23804;
23 Aug 95 17:53 EDT
Received: from nexen.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23800;
23 Aug 95 17:53 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by
nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA20135;
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:38:34 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
RAA19639 for rolc-out; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:33:59 -0400
Received: from phish.acton.timeplex.com (phish.acton.timeplex.com
[134.196.22.130]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id
RAA19630; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:33:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (malis@localhost) by phish.acton.timeplex.com
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA05331; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:33:53 -0400
Message-Id: <199508232133.RAA05331@phish.acton.timeplex.com>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
cc: rolc@nexen.com, malis@nexen.com
Subject: Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Aug 1995 14:38:24 PDT."
<199508222138.OAA12816@hubbub.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:33:53 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <malis@nexen.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
Yakov, > It seems that the following two extensions: > - NHRP Forward NHS Record Extension > - NHRP Reverse NHS Record Extension > > do not serve any useful purposes in NHRP. Therefore I would suggest > to delete them. I strongly disagree. I expect these to be invaluable for debugging an implementation, and when tracking down the inevitable operational problems once NHRP has been deployed. Andy
- NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Yakov Rekhter
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Andrew G. Malis
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Yakov Rekhter
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Andrew Smith
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Joel Halpern
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Andrew Smith