Re: router-router NHRP

[Yakov Rekhter <[e-mail]>]

Dimitry,

> It seems that we fail to communicate.  I never said that your "first
> constraint" requires the originator to "maintain in its FIB a route
> that covers *precisely* the same set of destinations as the target".
> I said (and I believe that you've just confirmed it) that it requires
> the originator to carry *a* route to the target which, of cause, can
> be a supperset of the target.  If we take as an example a transient
> domain with a need to carry the complete Internet set of target, it can
> account for circa 30,000 routes to cover the reachable destinations.

You are certainly correct. So, for example a domain that uses default
for exterior routing could just carry the default route and use
this default route for NHRP. NHRP doesn't alter the amount of routes 
that need to be carried.

Yakov.