IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Wed, 25 October 1995 22:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20398; 25 Oct 95 18:09 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20394; 25 Oct 95 18:09 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com ([204.249.99.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA19274; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:34:11 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA00701 for rolc-out; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:42:42 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA00687 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:42:38 -0400
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (brookfield-ef0.brookfield.ans.net [204.148.1.20]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA19238 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:31:10 -0400
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (localhost.brookfield.ans.net [127.0.0.1]) by brookfield.ans.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA18575; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:42:02 -0400
Message-Id: <199510252142.RAA18575@brookfield.ans.net>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
cc: curtis@ans.net, rolc@nexen.com
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Oct 1995 10:55:48 PDT." <199510251755.KAA19690@hubbub.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 17:42:00 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

In message <199510251755.KAA19690@hubbub.cisco.com>om>, Yakov Rekhter writes:
> Curtis,
> 
> > I also don't see that we need a new term for describe a prefix which
> > covers a subset of the NBMA or covers the NBMA completely.  (Or
> > whatever APR was supposed to mean).
> 
> As you may remember, this document used the term LIS. However, at the
> IP-ATM WG meeting, when I presented this document it was quite clear
> consensus that a new term is needed, as the semantics (and constraints)
> of APR are different from an IP subnet (or LIS).
> 
> Yakov.


I recall the IP-ATM WG meeting (I assume you mean Danvers) that we
needed a better term than NBMA, not the address prefixes that exist
within an NBMA.

Curtis]

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email