Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

["Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>]

Andrew,

> Based on the discussions we've had on the list, do you have
> a revised plan of campaign for progress of this draft? I would suggest 
> that we will need another last-call period after seeing Yakov and
> Dilip's next revision.

My last call certainly had the desired effect, which was to get the
comments out of the woodwork.  Given the extent of the comments, I
have no problem with at least extending it out two weeks from the
distribution of the new draft.  

> I think that it would also be productive to have a discussion on this 
> draft at the IETF meeting before forwarding to the AD. The ROLC session
> does not overlap with int-serv, ip-atm or rsvp so we should be
> able to get the relevant contributors from those groups together.

I would like to ask the WG's consensus on this.  We currently have one
session scheduled.  If we expect a lot of discussion at the IETF on
the draft, we may want to schedule a second session just for that
purpose.  Comments?

Thanks,
Andy
__________________________________________________________________________
Andrew G. Malis   Ascom Nexion                      voice: [phone]
[e-mail]   289 Great Rd., Acton MA 01720 USA   FAX: [phone]