r2r nhrp and destination prefix length extension

[Rajesh Varadarajan <[e-mail]>]

jim,
	I had sent out mail to the rolc list a few days back regarding this subject.

Here a cut-and-paste of the contents....

> The r2r nhrp document assumes that the destination prefix length in
> a NHRP request could be other than 0xffffffff. However, the NHRP draft explicitly
> states that the destination prefix length has to be 0xffffffff in a NHRP request.
> 
        > It would therefore clarify things if the r2r nhrp document (or the NHRP draft)
> explictly redefine the semantics of the destination prefix extension to allow
> NHRP requests to have the destination prefix extension field have a value other
> that 0xffffffff.
> 
> Thanks,
> rajesh
> [e-mail]


Will the next version of NHRP allow for NHRP requests to have values other
that 0xffffffff in the dest-prefix extension. Could you clarify?

Thanks,
rajesh