Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

[Yakov Rekhter <[e-mail]>]

Curtis,

So, to clarify the (apparent) confusion:

   APR != whole NBMA network.  Whole NBMA network may contain more than one APR.

Yakov.

> Just following instructions.  (almost) I removed one of my comments.
> Joel fired off I think 3 separate notes.  I think he just meant this
> one.
> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.2]) by brookfield.ans.net (8.6.12/8.
6.12) with SMTP id OAA13101 for <[e-mail]>et>; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 14:11:42 -0400
> Received: from ns.Newbridge.Com by interlock.ans.net with SMTP id AA15763
>   (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <[e-mail]>)t>);
>   Tue, 24 Oct 1995 14:08:57 -0400
> Received: (from adm@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA22976 for <[e-mail]>
; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:39:48 -0400
> Received: from portero(192.75.23.66) by ns via smap (V1.3)
> 	id sma022965; Tue Oct 24 13:39:24 1995
> Received: from mako.us.Newbridge.com (mako.us.newbridge.com [138.120.85.99]) by kanmaster.ca.newbri
dge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA13879 for <[e-mail]>et>; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:39:20 -0400
> Received: from lobster.Newbridge.COM by mako.us.Newbridge.com (4.1/SMI-4.0)
> 	id AA09197; Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:34:32 EDT
> Received: by lobster.Newbridge.COM (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
> 	id AA12328; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:38:25 +0500
> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:38:25 +0500
> From: [e-mail] (Joel Halpern)
> Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
> X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
> Content-Length: 1512
> 
> Would you please send your note (with my comments) to the list.
> I think the discussion will help others.  (I meant to send it to the
> list myself, but sent it too soon.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Joel
> 
> 
> - ----- Begin Included Message -----
> 
> >From [e-mail] Tue Oct 24 13:32:02 1995
> To: [e-mail] (Joel Halpern)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt 
> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:39:00 -0400
> From: Curtis Villamizar <[e-mail]>
> 
> 
> In message <[e-mail]>OM>, Joel Halpern writes:
> > If Yakov's document said that APR=whole NBMA network, then I missed it.
> > I certainly would not agree with that.  I am pretty sure that it was not
> > his intent.  If you can find where it said that, I would like to fix it.
> 
> It sounds like you interpretation of an APR is a prefix that falls
> entirely within an NBMA.
> 
> > The problem here may be related to that fact that the primary applicability
> > of an APR is for operation over an NBMA network.  Some of the descriptive
> > text may need repair to avoid implying the wrong meaning.
> 
> Yes.  We need to be clear as to whether this is a subset or an exact
> match for an NBMA.
> 
> > Yours,
> > Joel M. Halpern				[e-mail]
> > Newbridge Networks Inc. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Curtis
> 
> 
> - ----- End Included Message -----
> 
> 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>