IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com> Tue, 24 October 1995 02:01 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23762; 23 Oct 95 22:01 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23758; 23 Oct 95 22:01 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com ([204.249.99.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA03991; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 21:32:04 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id VAA05136 for rolc-out; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 21:40:44 -0400
Received: from nexen.nexen.com (nexen.nexen.com [204.249.96.18]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA05127 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 21:40:41 -0400
Received: from lightning.synoptics.com (lightning.synoptics.com [134.177.3.18]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA07869 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 21:39:42 -0400
Received: from pobox.synoptics.com ([134.177.1.95]) by lightning.synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05979; Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:37:24 PDT
Received: from milliways-le0.engwest (milliways-le0.synoptics.com) by pobox.synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06619; Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:38:46 PDT
Received: by milliways-le0.engwest (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA21184; Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:38:45 PDT
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:38:45 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com>
Message-Id: <9510240138.AA21184@milliways-le0.engwest>
To: yakov@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
Cc: rolc@nexen.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

> Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt 
> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 17:36:07 PDT
> From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>

Yakov,

> In the previous reincarnation of this document we use the term LIS, but
> at the IP-ATM WG meeting it was stronly suggested that a new term is
> needed. That is why we picked APR.

Sorry, I wasn't at the last IETF. How about IASG? (Internetwork Address Sub-Group).
Does the world really need yet another acronym for this thing?


Andrew


********************************************************************************
Andrew Smith					TEL:	+1 408 764 1574
Technology Synergy       			FAX:	+1 408 988 5525
Bay Networks, Inc.				E-m:	asmith@baynetworks.com
Santa Clara, CA
********************************************************************************

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email