Re: ARP and NHRP question
Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Fri, 01 December 1995 01:00 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04149;
30 Nov 95 20:00 EST
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04145;
30 Nov 95 20:00 EST
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.98.5]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA06687;
Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:32:13 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
TAA22495 for rolc-out; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:44:32 -0500
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by
maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA22484 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:44:27 -0500
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (brookfield-ef0.brookfield.ans.net
[204.148.1.20]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA06669
for <rolc@nexen.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:29:48 -0500
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (localhost.brookfield.ans.net [127.0.0.1])
by brookfield.ans.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA07776;
Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:41:26 -0500
Message-Id: <199512010041.TAA07776@brookfield.ans.net>
To: Carl Marcinik <carlm@fore.com>
cc: Mark Laubach <laubach@terra.com21.com>,
Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com>, bryang@eng.adaptec.com,
ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@nexen.com
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: ARP and NHRP question
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Nov 1995 19:51:45 EST."
<9511300051.AA20912@dolphin>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:41:22 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
> >The "son-of-1577" spec mandate is based on the consensus decision(s) made at > > >the Danver's meeting in the joint rolc & ip-atm session. > > Well, consensus can change based on new understanding, etc. It seems that > in the ARP/NHRP case it has. Let go to the meeting and see if it has. Curtis
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Tim Salo
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Eric W. Gray
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Tim Salo
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Grenville Armitage
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Bryan Gleeson
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Juha Heinanen
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Grenville Armitage
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Carl Marcinik
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Carl Marcinik
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Juha Heinanen
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Bryan Gleeson
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith