Re: NHRP for the router-to-router case (somewhat shorter message)
Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.dat.tele.fi> Sat, 15 July 1995 07:36 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00418;
15 Jul 95 3:36 EDT
Received: from [204.249.96.18] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00414;
15 Jul 95 3:36 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (maelstrom.nexen.com
[204.249.97.5]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA12401;
Sat, 15 Jul 1995 03:24:07 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com
(8.6.12/8.6.12) id DAA28875 for rolc-out; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 03:20:30 -0400
Received: from nexen.nexen.com ([204.249.96.18]) by
maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA28866 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 03:20:26 -0400
Received: from lohi.dat.tele.fi (lohi.dat.tele.fi [131.177.104.142]) by
nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA12393 for <rolc@nexen.com>;
Sat, 15 Jul 1995 03:20:23 -0400
Received: (from jh@localhost) by lohi.dat.tele.fi (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA08968;
Sat, 15 Jul 1995 10:14:50 +0300
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 10:14:50 +0300
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.dat.tele.fi>
Message-Id: <199507150714.KAA08968@lohi.dat.tele.fi>
To: asmith@baynetworks.com
CC: yakov@cisco.com, bcole@cisco.com, nfinn@cisco.com, rolc@nexen.com
In-reply-to: <9507142302.AA16014@milliways-le0> (asmith@Baynetworks.COM)
Subject: Re: NHRP for the router-to-router case (somewhat shorter message)
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
i fully agree with andrew. my position has always been that the router-to-router case should not complicate the host-to-host and host-to-router cases. so lets leave the the router-to-router case for another document and clean the current draft of all complications that it creates. -- juha
- Re: NHRP for the router-to-router case (somewhat … Andrew Smith
- Re: NHRP for the router-to-router case (somewhat … Juha Heinanen
- Re: NHRP for the router-to-router case (somewhat … Yakov Rekhter