IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

Tim Salo <salo@msc.edu> Thu, 26 October 1995 02:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24743; 25 Oct 95 22:50 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24739; 25 Oct 95 22:50 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com ([204.249.99.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA21018; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:18:54 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA02924 for rolc-out; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:29:01 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA02914 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:28:58 -0400
Received: from noc.msc.edu (noc.msc.edu [137.66.12.254]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA21014 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:17:35 -0400
Received: from uh.msc.edu by noc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0.1(920324)) id AA11226; Wed, 25 Oct 95 21:25:10 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tim Salo <salo@msc.edu>
Received: (salo@localhost) by uh.msc.edu (8.7.1/8.6.6) id VAA04398; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 21:25:09 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 21:25:09 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199510260225.VAA04398@uh.msc.edu>
To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
Cc: rolc@nexen.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

> To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
> Cc: curtis@ans.net, rolc@nexen.com
> Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt 
> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:08:24 -0400
> From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
> 	[...]
> In an NBMA subnet (subnet often implied as in "for an NBMA OSPF
> does..."), there is no broadcast, and all hosts are interconnected.
> In a large NBMA network, there may be multiple NBMA subnets and from a
> layer 2 standpoint all hosts are interconnected.
> 	[...]
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                   interconnectable?

(Yes, I know it is not, or at least ought not be, a word....)

They aren't really connected, but they could be connected, such as via
PVCs or SVCs.

-tjs

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email