IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Wed, 25 October 1995 18:26 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15228; 25 Oct 95 14:26 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15224; 25 Oct 95 14:26 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com ([204.249.99.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA16602; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 13:51:24 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA26837 for rolc-out; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 14:01:00 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA26828 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 14:00:57 -0400
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (hubbub.cisco.com [198.92.30.32]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA16558 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 13:49:39 -0400
Received: from puli.cisco.com (puli.cisco.com [171.69.1.174]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with SMTP id KAA19690; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 10:55:49 -0700
Message-Id: <199510251755.KAA19690@hubbub.cisco.com>
To: curtis@ans.net
cc: rolc@nexen.com
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Oct 95 13:13:46 EDT." <199510251713.NAA17532@brookfield.ans.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 95 10:55:48 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

Curtis,

> I also don't see that we need a new term for describe a prefix which
> covers a subset of the NBMA or covers the NBMA completely.  (Or
> whatever APR was supposed to mean).

As you may remember, this document used the term LIS. However, at the
IP-ATM WG meeting, when I presented this document it was quite clear
consensus that a new term is needed, as the semantics (and constraints)
of APR are different from an IP subnet (or LIS).

Yakov.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email