Re: NHRP-MIB
David Horton <horton@citr.uq.oz.au> Wed, 10 May 1995 07:33 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23925;
10 May 95 3:33 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
id aa23921; 10 May 95 3:33 EDT
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com
(8.6.9/ACTON-MAIN-1.2) id DAA13014 for rolc-out;
Wed, 10 May 1995 03:27:22 -0400
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1]) by
maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.9/ACTON-MAIN-1.2) with SMTP id DAA13009 for
<rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com>; Wed, 10 May 1995 03:27:18 -0400
Received: from citrus.citr.uq.oz.au by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au with SMTP (PP);
Wed, 10 May 1995 17:27:32 +1000
Received: from joppa.citr.uq.oz.au (joppa)
by citrus.citr.uq.oz.au (5.65c/CiTR-Generic) ;
id <AA19633@citrus.citr.uq.oz.au>; Wed, 10 May 1995 17:27:13 +1000
Received: from cumquat by joppa.citr.uq.oz.au (5.65/CiTR-Generic) ;
id <AA20623@joppa.citr.uq.oz.au>; Wed, 10 May 1995 17:27:11 +1000
Received: from localhost by cumquat (5.65c/CiTR-Client) ; id <AA15211@cumquat>;
Wed, 10 May 1995 17:23:08 -0500
Message-Id: <15211.199505102223@cumquat>
To: mpatrick@prospero.dev.cdx.mot.com
Cc: rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com
Subject: Re: NHRP-MIB
Date: Wed, 10 May 95 17:23:06 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: David Horton <horton@citr.uq.oz.au>
X-Mts: smtp
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@maelstrom.timeplex.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
I have some questions/clarifications/suggestions with regard
to draft-ietf-rolc-nhrp-mib-00.
On page [9] Is AddressType the set of numbers in rfc1700 (Assigned Numbers)
Page 91 "Address family numbers"? (Which is 16 bit).
On page [13/14] Should the type of nhrpIfNetworkID be IpAddress?
On page [17] Declaration of nhrpServerDestNet duplicated
On pages [17/18] Last attribute inconsistently named
(a) nrhpServerEntryStatus and (b) nhrpServerRowStatus, shouldn't it just be
nrhpServerStatus
On page [20] I presume nhrpAddrDestLinkAddr corresponds to
{NBMA length + NBMA address} fields of the NHRP packets. Isn't there
a need for an address type field to correspond to the {Address Type}
field of the NHRP packet?
On pages [19/21] Last attribute inconsistently named
(a) nhrpAddrEntryStatus and (b) nhrpAddrRowStatus, shouldn't it just be
nhrpAddrStatus?
Does an ifIndex have to be defined for NHS operating in server mode?
MUST the NHS be part of the LIS that it is serving? Could one NHS serve
multiple LIS from a single central address?
regards,
David
=============================================================================
David Horton
Centre for Information Technology Research
University of Queensland, 4072 Australia
Email: d.horton@citr.uq.oz.au Phone +61 7 3654321 Fax +61 7 3654399
=============================================================================
- Re: NHRP-MIB David Horton
- Re: NHRP-MIB David Horton