Re: router-router NHRP

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Tue, 07 November 1995 17:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16113; 7 Nov 95 12:50 EST
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16105; 7 Nov 95 12:50 EST
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.99.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA27598; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:21:50 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA07279 for rolc-out; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:29:29 -0500
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA07270 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:29:27 -0500
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (hubbub.cisco.com [198.92.30.32]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA27542 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:15:42 -0500
Received: from puli.cisco.com (puli.cisco.com [171.69.1.174]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with SMTP id JAA26892; Tue, 7 Nov 1995 09:23:57 -0800
Message-Id: <199511071723.JAA26892@hubbub.cisco.com>
To: Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@baynetworks.com>
cc: rolc@nexen.com
Subject: Re: router-router NHRP
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Nov 95 12:17:20 EST." <9511071717.AA29910@pobox.BayNetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 95 09:23:56 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

Dimitry,
> If I understand your R2R NHRP proposal correctly, it requires that *all*
> participating routers keep in their FIBs all routes that might be
> distributed by the intra-domain protocol of choice regardless if these
> routes are actually being used for shortcuts or not.

I don't think my proposal requires this.

Yakov.