Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

[Curtis Villamizar <[e-mail]>]

In message <[e-mail]>, "Andrew G. Malis" writes:
> 
> > I think that it would also be productive to have a discussion on this 
> > draft at the IETF meeting before forwarding to the AD. The ROLC session
> > does not overlap with int-serv, ip-atm or rsvp so we should be
> > able to get the relevant contributors from those groups together.
> 
> I would like to ask the WG's consensus on this.  We currently have one
> session scheduled.  If we expect a lot of discussion at the IETF on
> the draft, we may want to schedule a second session just for that
> purpose.  Comments?

If this draft was sent to int-serv or rsvp in the first place you
would have recieved a lot of comments from people on those lists that
don't lurk on the rolc list.

You might want to have some discussion at Dallas and forward a note
about this draft to int-serv and rolc prior to the meeting to get
comments.  This will avoid sending a draft with insufficient review to
the AD and getting a barrage of comments when the draft hits
ietf-announce (clearly less desirable).

Curtis