Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt

[Andrew Smith <[e-mail]>]

Andy,

Based on the discussions we've had on the list, do you have
a revised plan of campaign for progress of this draft? I would suggest 
that we will need another last-call period after seeing Yakov and
Dilip's next revision.

I think that it would also be productive to have a discussion on this 
draft at the IETF meeting before forwarding to the AD. The ROLC session
does not overlap with int-serv, ip-atm or rsvp so we should be
able to get the relevant contributors from those groups together.
 

Andrew


********************************************************************************
Andrew Smith					TEL:	[phone]
Technology Synergy Unit				FAX:	[phone]
Bay Networks, Inc.				E-m:	[e-mail]
Santa Clara, CA
********************************************************************************



> From [e-mail] Fri Oct 20 08:07:57 1995
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 10:53:54 -0400
> From: "Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>
> Content-Length: 813
> 
> This is a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt, for
> the purpose of publishing this I-D as an Informational RFC.  Please
> send comments to the list.
> 
> The Last Call period will last for two weeks (plus a weekend, since
> I'm sending this on Friday), and will end at 23:59:59 PST on Sunday
> 11/5/95.  Due to the clock change, you get an extra hour in the
> process! :-)
> 
> At the conclusion of the period, the comments will be addressed, and
> if necessary, a new revision of the I-D will be produced.  The I-D
> will then be submitted from the WG to the Area Director.
> 
> Regards,
> Andy
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew G. Malis   Ascom Nexion                      voice: [phone]
> [e-mail]   289 Great Rd., Acton MA 01720 USA   FAX: [phone]
>