IETF Logo Mail Archive

Purge packet

Koichi Horikawa <horikawa@nwk.cl.nec.co.jp> Tue, 26 September 1995 07:20 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07205; 26 Sep 95 3:20 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07200; 26 Sep 95 3:20 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA28240; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:02:13 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id DAA13572 for rolc-out; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:04:48 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA13559 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 03:04:43 -0400
Received: from research.gate.nec.co.jp (research.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.49]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id CAA28215 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:57:54 -0400
Received: from tomato.nwk.cl.nec.co.jp by research.gate.nec.co.jp (8.6.12+2.5Wb4/950912) with SMTP id QAA01874; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:03:04 +0900
Received: by nwk.cl.nec.co.jp (5.65c/6.4JAIN-nwk-gw+2.1) id AA12264; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:02:56 +0900
Received: by lettuce.nwk.cl.nec.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/NWK-950509) id QAA03374; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:02:49 +0900
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:02:49 +0900
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Koichi Horikawa <horikawa@nwk.cl.nec.co.jp>
Message-Id: <199509260702.QAA03374@lettuce.nwk.cl.nec.co.jp>
To: gardo@vnet.ibm.com
Cc: rolc@nexen.com
In-Reply-To: gardo@vnet.ibm.com's message of Sat, 23 Sep 95 14:59:19 EDT <199509231918.PAA19577@guelah.nexen.com>
Subject: Purge packet
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

Hi,

gardo@vnet.ibm.com says...

> ...
> Also, I noticed a possible typo in the draft:
> Do you know why the "A" bit is in bit position 0 of the PURGE packet
> but always in bit position 2 of the other packets?

"A" bit in the Purge packet is for "Acknowledgement",isn't it?  So
it's different from "A" bit in the other packets (for"Authoritative").

Right?

Regards,
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Koichi Horikawa (^o^)
                     Network Research Laboratory,
                 C&C Research Laboratories, NEC Corp.
             FAX: +81-44-856-2230   TEL: +81-44-856-2123

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email