Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt (1)

[Andrew Smith <[e-mail]>]

> From [e-mail] Mon Oct 23 09:23:33 1995
> To: [e-mail] (Andrew Smith)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rolc-apr-00.txt (1) 
> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 09:20:26 PDT
> From: Yakov Rekhter <[e-mail]>

Yakov,

> > 3. Are RFCs allowed to reference ATM Forum documents? Should probably
> > reference LANE (ftp://atmforum.com/pub/LANE/af-lane-0021.000)
> > since it is mentioned in the text.
> 
> We can certainly mention ATM Forum documents (although the document is not limited to 
> ATM (and LANE)). Where in the text would you suggest to stick this reference ?

In the references section 9. You already mention LANE in the text in section 6, page 8.
BTW, since section 6 is supposed to be just conclusions, maybe it would be more
appropriate to bring in the mentions of LANE and MPOA as other examples of 
ATM technologies earlier on e.g. in the "background" section 1 .

> > 
> > 4. Maybe mention MPOA somehow?
> > 
> Again, we could probably do this... Where would you like to stick such reference ?

See above. Difficult to find a concrete document to cite as a reference right now :-)
I do, however, think it worthwhile in an information RFC to point readers at where the
standards-track work *is* going on.

> Yakov.
> 

Andrew


********************************************************************************
Andrew Smith					TEL:	[phone]
Technology Synergy Unit				FAX:	[phone]
Bay Networks, Inc.				E-m:	[e-mail]
Santa Clara, CA
********************************************************************************