Re: Application Statement

[Ted Matsumura <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 14 Mar 1995, Ross Callon wrote:

> 
> > Is a "solution" that causes routing loops when you put extra (back
> > door) links in for redundancy to your building(s) that still have
> > ethernet hubs wired up (and actually have occasion to use that
> > redundancy) really a solution?  Or is it snake oil?
> 
> The "backdoors" in this case mean non-ATM connections between 
> routers which are also connected via an ATM "cloud". One 
> question comes to mind here: 
> 
> I am perhaps as much of a believer in ATM as anyone 
> on this list and am a regular participant in the ATM Forum. 
> However, I am also a bit "conservative", in the sense that 
> I would not want to purchase a new make of car, a car that 
> was based on brand new technology, or to put in some sort 
...

Ross,
  I agree with your desire to stick with the known is more comforting 
than being on the edge with new technology in critical situations, 
however, many of the changes in auto technology such as ABS, active 
suspension, electronic fuel injection, etc. are put into place without 
the consumer knowing what changes are really going on under the hood.

You may very well be driving a '65 'Stang that you know backwards and 
forwards, but it's possible that when you go for a ride in your mother in 
law's Infiniti Q45 with ABS, EFI, and active suspension, your life is 
riding on that technology you thought was "brand new technology" and 
possibly untested...

Ted Matsumura

[e-mail]