IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Vendor Private Extension

Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com> Fri, 14 July 1995 18:54 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05757; 14 Jul 95 14:54 EDT
Received: from [204.249.96.18] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05753; 14 Jul 95 14:54 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA29183; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:55:33 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA17582 for rolc-out; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:35:58 -0400
Received: from nexen.nexen.com ([204.249.96.18]) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA17573; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:35:56 -0400
Received: from lightning.synoptics.com (lightning.synoptics.com [134.177.3.18]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA28824; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:35:54 -0400
Received: from BayNetworks.COM ([134.177.1.95]) by lightning.synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08443; Fri, 14 Jul 95 10:33:25 PDT
Received: from milliways-le0 (milliways-le0.synoptics.com) by BayNetworks.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA29854; Fri, 14 Jul 95 10:33:54 PDT
Received: by milliways-le0 (4.1/2.0N) id AA15716; Fri, 14 Jul 95 10:35:48 PDT
Message-Id: <9507141735.AA15716@milliways-le0>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 95 10:35:48 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com>
To: bcole@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Vendor Private Extension
Cc: malis@nexen.com, rolc@nexen.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

> From owner-rolc@nexen.com Wed Jul 12 23:11:05 1995
> To: James Luciani <luciani@nexen.com>
> Cc: Bruce Cole <bcole@cisco.com>om>, rolc@nexen.com
> Subject: Re: Vendor Private Extension  
> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 22:57:05 -0700
> From: Bruce Cole <bcole@cisco.com>

Bruce,

> Either scheme will work, maybe one can be picked next week.

I know there are several people who have opinions on your and
Yakov's proposed amendments who cannot be at the IETF next week.
I think we would be grateful if you all used the meeting next
week for presentations and discussions but please can we use
the list to make decisions and gather the required "rough consensus"?
These are difficult to do over the MBONE.


Thanks,

Andrew


********************************************************************************
Andrew Smith					TEL:	+1 408 764 1574
Technology Synergy Unit				FAX:	+1 408 988 5525
Bay Networks, Inc.				E-m:	asmith@baynetworks.com
Santa Clara, CA
********************************************************************************

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email